Paying teachers union to campaign against PC's.
$40M Gas Plant cancellation (actually over $1B).
E-mail deletion.
Sole sourced Samsung windmill deal.
Changing Auditor General scope to allow for partisan advertising.
False claims of balanced budget (confirmed by Financial Accountability Officer (FAO)).
Cutting healthcare at time when federal government was giving 6% increases in health transfers.
Your claims have been addressed by others.
But I'll reinforce, the majority don't meet the criteria of corruption at all.
cor·rup·tion
kəˈrəpSH(ə)n/
noun
noun:
corruption; plural noun:
corruptions
1.
dishonest or fraudulent conduct by those in power, typically involving bribery.
***
In respect of the gas plant cancellation itself, there is no such allegation.
Nor the Samsung Deal.
Email deletion is not itself a corrupt act, except in so far as it covers the tracks of same. (proof please)
As someone who disagrees the Liberal choice not to raise taxes to pay for spending, I find the AG and FAO's criticisms unfounded and suspect. These exact same rules were used by the Harris Tories
to define the budget/deficit at that time.
I don't see you distrusting Tory numbers even though they were calculated the same way.
Your last claim is outright untrue. Not only has the health budget never been reduced even once, no subset has either (hospitals, long term care, physician services).
What did happen was increases below the rate of transfer increase.
What also happened was individual fees for certain services were reduced, as well they should be. We continue to overpay cataracts surgeons by leaps and bounds. A fee that was appropriate when the surgery took a full hour, is not at all appropriate when it takes 15 minutes, as is now the case.
In any event, not a corrupt act.
