cplchanb
Senior Member
The irony is that the barrier is actually much taller than the curb so technically it's more saferThere is no way anyone would ever use that path. It's ridiculous. In no way it feels safe.
The irony is that the barrier is actually much taller than the curb so technically it's more saferThere is no way anyone would ever use that path. It's ridiculous. In no way it feels safe.
It's essentially in a middle of a highway. Would you dare walking on it?The irony is that the barrier is actually much taller than the curb so technically it's more safer
If i was in that situation what choice would I have? There is no other way to walk across the bridge, so I might as well get used to itIt's essentially in a middle of a highway. Would you dare walking on it?
Don’t forget about crossing the street at the centre at the two Highway 400 exits’ intersections. With traffic moving on both sides, the crosswalk even with the bus lane buffer is going to feel stressful. Unless that’s not how the traffic phasing works.I'm really interested to "try it out" to be honest. These median interchange MUPs have been common in the US for a while, but they are usually in very low pedestrian activity areas. This one will likely see more pedestrians than those, with people walking to and from the subway, especially from the condos on the west side of the 400. While the reality is that it is very safe, my concern is more how comfortable it feels. I'm a little more doubtful on that. It strikes me as very much being an "engineers solution" based on efficiency and measurable metrics, not actual human comfort and enjoyment.
I'm really interested to "try it out" to be honest. These median interchange MUPs have been common in the US for a while, but they are usually in very low pedestrian activity areas. This one will likely see more pedestrians than those, with people walking to and from the subway, especially from the condos on the west side of the 400. While the reality is that it is very safe, my concern is more how comfortable it feels. I'm a little more doubtful on that. It strikes me as very much being an "engineers solution" based on efficiency and measurable metrics, not actual human comfort and enjoyment.
^it would be insane to run on that path
That's assuming that YRT allows ZUM buses to use it. Considering that they don't even allow their own vehicles to use the already open sections elsewhere, it wouldn't surprise me if the ZUM buses were relegated to the regular traffic lanes.
Dan
That's the Mobilio sales centre under construction on the left side.I was able to confirm that Züm uses the new Rapidway. 501 buses use the [takes deep breath] SmartCentres Place Bus Terminal at Vaughan Metropolitan Centre to layover and turn around.
View attachment 219732
I was able to confirm that Züm uses the new Rapidway. 501 buses use the [takes deep breath] SmartCentres Place Bus Terminal at Vaughan Metropolitan Centre to layover and turn around.
View attachment 219732
Most of the non-TTC transit agencies do an okay job. They all have fare integration with each other.I must say, I'm pleasantly surprised. It's not often that YRT is able to play nice with others.