dowlingm
Senior Member
Davisville northbound platform to mezzanine. Was on it last Monday.All I asked was what escalators on the system are too narrow for two people to stand side by side. I never mentioned anything about signs...
Davisville northbound platform to mezzanine. Was on it last Monday.All I asked was what escalators on the system are too narrow for two people to stand side by side. I never mentioned anything about signs...
There's a handful of narrow ones. Walking past people on those was never an option, as they aren't wide enough for people to even think about it.sorry my bad. I know I've been on one somewhere but can't remember where it was maybe King sation, I know a lot of the older sations have some very tight stairs and escalators in them. Queen also has a few fairly narrow ones too.
I don't recall any change that lead to the addition of escalators. There were some escalators from day 1 (well, I'm not 100% sure about the original 12 Yonge line stations). On Bloor-Danforth, there were complaints after it opened about not being escalators in some places, so they did add some - but I don't think there was a legal requirement.Don't forget when the subway first opened having stairs ment it was accessible, then the building code changed and they had to add escalators ...
Queen-Coxwell intersection rebuild this summer. Maybe the scope will include some tangent north of the intersection. As Leslie fills up that section of track is going to be critical to pushing enough cars into service since there is no connection between 506 and Queen East/Kingston Road tracks beyond Coxwell.Coxwell from Queen to Upper Gerrard is a disaster. I was under the impression that the entire track would be replaced this summer after last year's sewer work. Does not seem to be the case. There are also quite a few small patches on Queen East which I would think if you arrested the decay now, you could save a major rebuild from having to be done.
The ultimate solution is pulling out the tracks, and replacing the entire top coat of concrete, and relaying.Coxwell from Queen to Upper Gerrard is a disaster. I was under the impression that the entire track would be replaced this summer after last year's sewer work. Does not seem to be the case. There are also quite a few small patches on Queen East which I would think if you arrested the decay now, you could save a major rebuild from having to be done.
Yes, I walk down there all the time, and I've watched it deteriorate over the years. They have tackled the worst of it occasionally, and there aren't any slow orders. The last schedule I saw, had it in for 2019. Presumably they think they can hang on for that long. It's certainly not as bad as some of the track was before the last rebuild - Dundas East comes to mind ... how many years were those slow orders in place? And visually it looked far worse than Coxwell before the rebuild.Coxwell from Queen to Upper Gerrard is a disaster. I was under the impression that the entire track would be replaced this summer after last year's sewer work. Does not seem to be the case.
I assume they are doing this. Didn't they do some quick 1-day rail replacement projects on Queen East recently - they certainly did on King East. And they did do repair work on Coxwell last year - see the copies of the construction notices at http://transit.toronto.on.ca/archives/weblog/2016/01/22-coxwell_st.shtml - I bet if you searched that site, you'd find similar for Queen East. You'll notice in the Coxwell work they spent the week removing the old concrete during active service, and then replaced it over a weekend of bustitution.There are also quite a few small patches on Queen East which I would think if you arrested the decay now, you could save a major rebuild from having to be done.
Though the 2016 five-year rebuild schedule had it as two separate projects (in 2017 and 2019). I doubt they'd go very far north, given all the work they did on Coxwell loop a year or two ago.Queen-Coxwell intersection rebuild this summer. Maybe the scope will include some tangent north of the intersection.
Yeah, I think we all know that one day, there is going to be nightmare service, when some incident on Leslie early in the day traps all the cars in the yard. There's a weak point there - the other two yards have two different ways they can feed cars into the network. Given how close they are, I'm surprised they didn't slip in a 500-metre long emergency-only use connecting track (single track) up Knox and along Eastern to Russell Yard, while they had all those $. Would have been a pittance compared to what else they spent. Ultimately, they'll be able to feed out on Commissioners to Broadview, but who knows how many decades away that is.As Leslie fills up that section of track is going to be critical to pushing enough cars into service since there is no connection between 506 and Queen East/Kingston Road tracks beyond Coxwell.
Is the current plan to do the track on Victoria? The 2016 schedule was to the Dundas Square intersections this year and Victoria from Queen to Dundas next year. I don't see Church on the schedule, other than the Richmond intersection in 2019, and the Queen/Carlton intersections in 2021 or later.Did you notice that they are rebuilding streetcar track on long stretch of the 501 route, Wellington is getting new track, new overhead is being strung, the Dundas, Victoria and Church track is about to be replaced and many old streetcars are being refurbished.
One year ago, I was cheered to learn that the TTC had been given $1 billion of federal infrastructure money to do backlogged repairs. What did it go on? Where is it? I was hoping to see some of the worst track replaced (see previous post) and instead from Steve Munro's Feb 2016 track plan, the Broadview-Dundas interection has been pushed back another year or to heaven knows when.
What did that $1 billion buy? Not a peep from any of Toronto's daily journals - only hand-wringing over the state of the situation. Where is the continuity and focus?
That's too sexy, and can take a while to get going and implement. They want quick spends.Second entrance?
$16,4 million. It's probably been paying for a lot of the work since April 2016.Overhead?
Of what? Nothing much to be added. There's $34 million for the T1 subway car overhauls - that would include fixing the air conditioning in those cars.Air conditioning?
The funding was for capital expenditures, cleaning would be an operational expense - though the recent increase in gas funding could go to that. (though I don't know how TTC gets away with routine bus and train overhauls as being a capital expenditure - but they do).Clean floors?
Again too sexy and long-term. But there is $16 million to replace bus hoists in most of the garages.McNicoll garage planning?
This is exactly what they do. Something similar like this happened on Lakeshore near Kipling last year where the track got so bad to the point it nearly cracked. There was a slow order put in place for weeks without doing anything, and they finally got around to implementing a fix where they maintained service and had to remove the entire top coat of concrete and replace it. Service had to be replaced by buses for a day or two.The ultimate solution is pulling out the tracks, and replacing the entire top coat of concrete, and relaying.
In the interim, there's not much you can quickly except shovel in some asphalt. What TTC seems to do is let it alone, until it gets bad enough that they have to do a slow order. And then they do one of those quick repairs, where they either stop service overnight, or on a weekend, and dig it out between the track and right lane, and relay the concrete. Or sometimes even do it while service continues - which they did on Broadview between Dundas and Gerrard a few months ago, after that slow order went into place (now lifted).
The Eglinton line is very misaligned in the eastern end. They squeeze everything to show all stations. Now they'll have to fix VP to Kennedy on Line 2. Warden to Kennedy is the longest distance between two stations and it looks slightly longer than Bay to Yonge.Ah, that's an improvement. The last version I saw from TTC 18 months ago, had the Eglinton West to Sheppard West bit lined up with half-way between Christie and Bathurst but Finch West aligning with Keele leaving a strange long line between Sheppard West and Finch West stations.. Now St. Clair West aligns with Bathurst, and Sheppeard West aligns with Dufferin. And the longer piece is between St. Clair West and Eglinton West - which matches reality.
Here's a snippet of the old (November 2015) version.
View attachment 106374
They should do this, if the primary criteria was to show reasonable stop spacing. Similar issues at Kipling. And of course the vertical issues - which have always been there (look at the spacing around Lawrence ... the distance to Eglinton and York Mills is about the same as Bloor to Queen).The Eglinton line is very misaligned in the eastern end. They squeeze everything to show all stations. Now they'll have to fix VP to Kennedy on Line 2. Warden to Kennedy is the longest distance between two stations and it looks slightly longer than Bay to Yonge.
Isn't an official TTC twitter account a good enough source? (if you didn't see the hyperlink, click on the word "confirmed")Finch would be a switch from 7 to six? Also, source?