amnesiajune
Senior Member
But since traffic and commuting are so painful in the GTA / GTHA would there not be a considerable political price for doing so? Is there not an expectation in the populace that SOMEONE should be doing SOMETHING and if a new government tore up those plans and caused further delay and deterioration in the quality of life, would that not be a large, early black eye.
People tend to forget how crazy the situation was in the 1980s and 1990s (most people on this forum probably weren't even alive back then). There's a reason why David Peterson proposed such an ambitious plan and the next two governments slowly dismantled it - the economy collapsed and brought down transit ridership with it! There was no money for transit expansion, and the existing system was suddenly well under capacity. TTC ridership fell 20% from 1988 to 1995. There was also no need to develop employment centres in the suburbs, since lots of industrial land in the city core was suddenly unused and available for development. Relief for the Yonge Line was also no longer a priority - it took 23 years for weekday subway ridership to get back to what it was in the late-1980s.
You might see a new government change its transit priorities (for Sheppard East in particular), but they aren't just going to tear apart Metrolinx and go back to car-oriented development.
Last edited: