I think they will only allow occupancy once the floodproofing is complete.
That's the plan.
I think they will only allow occupancy once the floodproofing is complete.
No major news here, just a couple of notes.
There will be no major new buildings on site till the berms go in along the Don Roadway side of the site; that project in turn is intertwined w/the Gardiner East replacement, in whatever form that takes.
The Gardiner project starts massive cashflow in 2020, based on currently approved plans/budgets.
It is correct that the Occupancy of the first buildings cannot be done until the Flood protection is installed. But the buildings will start construction to be complete in time for flood protection to be in place and basically open right when it is finished.
The Gardiner East does have a small effect on the site, but not as important as the flood protection. The two are not as intertwined as it would seem.
On the Amazon front, most signs are pointing to Virginia getting it. First Gulf wouldn't bet the whole development only on getting Amazon so there would definitely be other players lined up behind the scenes to occupy parts of the 10 million sqft of space. To add to that point the full build out of the site wouldn't be until at least 2035-40. plenty of time to have things move around.
Cheers,
The berm will start immediately south of the rail corridor embankment, and there will have to be some measures taken north of that too. I believe that any redevelopment of the BMW site to the north will need berming, and/or the break in the berm for Broadview Avenue has to be taken into consideration. Entrances to the Relief Line station also have to be protected if a berm does not extend south from Eastern Avenue to the rail embankment.
42
Though UTers may want to 'add more to the Toronto skyline' developers want to make $$$ and this is already HUGE development in a 'new' area that will undoubtedly not be too easy to sell (until it 'takes off''.) If it does so before it is completed I bet it will go higher but until then.....I feel like this location has the potential to go for something even bigger, like the (Hudson Yards) in NYC. Density, shading of nearby buildings or transportation wouldn't be an issue here, so why not go larger to add more to Toronto's skyline.
Though UTers may want to 'add more to the Toronto skyline' developers want to make $$$ and this is already HUGE development in a 'new' area that will undoubtedly not be too easy to sell (until it 'takes off''. If it does so before it is completed I bet it will go higher but until then.....
It almost looks like the office towers are circling and crowding the central plaza, making it covered in shadow for most of the day. Wouldn't we want to be shifting the massing to maximize sunlight there? I have no problem with the tower heights, just their placement and shape.New (placeholder) rendering of the East Harbour site up on the official website. Some differences which can help us understand the potential massing of towers that the most recent rendering seems to have a more dense cluster of towers in the centre. Additionally, the park with the "Amazon domes" on the south-east part of the site is now represented by a building. Also, it is at a slightly different angle. Again, remember that this is a placeholder.
Compared to the last/older rendering: