News   Dec 20, 2024
UrbanToronto Year-End Poll: Vote on the Best Buildings of 2024, presented by Sapphire Balconies
 1K     5 
News   Dec 20, 2024
UrbanToronto's Social Media Presence Skyrocketed in 2024
 787     2 
News   Dec 20, 2024
Mattamy Homes Records A Year of Accomplishments
 1.5K     0 

Rob Ford's Toronto

Status
Not open for further replies.
Dubster said:
Except it isn't at all clear they have Ford dead to rights yet in any sense. Remember in all that surveillance they didn't see Ford once. There are just too many gaps in the puzzle to speculate they have a smoking gun on Ford himself.
Click to expand...

That surveillance report was just for one night. Who know what else they have?
 
pattycakes said:
Why doesn't he resign?
Click to expand...

Knowing Rob Ford, he'll lock himself in his office bathroom before being dragged out by Mike Toolaram and escorted to Doug Ford waiting in the garage next to Ford's Escalade who finally loses his shit with reporters and punches one in the eye. For the next 3 years Rob will be outside on the traffic island at Queen and Bay banned from Nathan Phillips Square shouting conspiracy theories at cars passing by and sticking fridge magnets on as many as he can. Then one day, Ford mysteriously vanishes only to re-appear every 4 years to run in the municipal election coming 2 spots behind Kevin Clarke every time.
 
Last edited:
pattycakes said:
Now that the TPS is starting to leak documents again, it's no surprise Ford is scrambling. The Star always writes him for an opportunity to respond, before the story is printed. He knows that the end is near, and it's going to get worse, Why doesn't he resign?
Click to expand...

Because at this point there is nobody to blame but himself, and we all know that he could never acknowledge such a thing.

Once he figures out how to be the victim in all of this, the thought might cross his mind... for a very brief moment... one could hope.
 
Dubster said:
Except it isn't at all clear they have Ford dead to rights yet in any sense. Remember in all that surveillance they didn't see Ford once. There are just too many gaps in the puzzle to speculate they have a smoking gun on Ford himself.
Click to expand...

OK - you know what, you need to read more critically and more carefully. Just because the article says that Ford wasn't mentioned by name in the surveillance reports of that day, it doesn't mean they did not see him.

Typical Police MO would actually be to use a code name known only to a select few people, for exactly this reason - it's another level of protection against leaks in high-profile cases.
 
Jimmi T said:
Go back to articles from this summer. Attacker described as black guy mid to late 30s.
Click to expand...

I missed this as well. Could be a red herring, or lie out of fear. Y'know, cuz snitches be gettin' stitches. I always assumed it was both Price and Lisi.
 
While the report offers no details about the cellphone up for sale, it does give a time-stamped sequence of Siad’s movements:

2:53 p.m.: The police crew follows Siad as he drives from his apartment on Richgrove Dr. to the nearby Dixon Rd. highrises.

3 p.m.: Siad parks his black Honda Civic underground at the apartment building at 370 Dixon Rd.

3:12 p.m.: Detectives learn Siad is selling a cellular phone, not a gun.

3:30 p.m.: Surveillance is discontinued for the afternoon and officers attend a debriefing.
.
Click to expand...


This may have been brought up before.
But why was the surveillance discontinued?
Were the cops called off because it was the phone, and not a gun?
Who called them off? Ford's friends (Traver?)
Apparently, the police knew of the phone video before this.
 
Before today, we knew that the video had been shot within six months of the Star seeing it in early-May. Today, we learned in the Poisson/Donovan story that the photo (and video) are "believed to have been taken in 2012."

The first snowfall of 2012 was on November 4th, but I don't believe that there was any accumulation. The kind of snow that accumulates (like in the background of the photo) didn't start falling until Nov 24th, which gives us a 5-week period in which it could have been shot.

I don't have any special insight, but I thought I'd point that out.
 
Thanks for the update pal!

Can we assume that the fact that you're bringing this to light now indicates that lips are starting to loosen even more?

SS Ford about to sink?
 
MetroMan said:
I was able to meet with with John Cook last month facilitated by a friend who was interviewing him but I was sworn to secrecy. I guess it's out now. He knows the police have seen the video. Connecting the dots, I personally think he's telling a white lie here and tipped the cops about his meeting. I know I would, I'd be shitting my pants meeting with a gangster in the projects of an unknown city in the back of a car stripped of my cellphone. Maybe he tipped them that a gun transaction was taking place in hopes that the cops would bust him, confiscate the cell phone and Gawker would have the whole first person exclusive scoop about how the Toronto Police busted the guy who was selling the Rob Ford crack video, all without having to pay Siad a single Abe Lincoln penny.

My impression is that Gawker knows more than they're writing about. They're not actively pursuing the story like The Star and the Globe are but they have some leads that might bust this thing wide open if they can convince one or more people to come forward with the video. It was through John Cook via this media source that I came to find out that the video was being copied and was getting into hands that could potentially put it online (Side note: I'm glad I can finally say that, I was getting heat for allegedly leaking Crown insider information -- I have none).

Following this lead, I was able to connect it to one person in particular who is known to use LiveLeak.com which is why I said to watch the site. Alas, it never did pan out but I'm holding out hope that it will eventually get copied by somebody who doesn't fear putting it online. It's outside the original group of dangerous people so I think it's only a matter of time before people lose track of who has it and who could have possibly leaked it.

I'm not usually able offer a lot of evidence to back up my claims because I'm protecting sources but this time I have photo evidence of that meeting with Cook:

View attachment 19216

Yes. A back ally meeting. How cliché?
Click to expand...

Do you know why the cops were pulled off the surveillance?
 
newearthling said:
Do you know why the cops were pulled off the surveillance?
Click to expand...

I posted this yesterday, but I heard a rumour originating from the TPS that a number of officers were pulled off Project Traveller once Ford popped up in the investigation. Could be part of a plan at the time to tread lightly.
 
Thank you MetroMan! Have you heard anything about scripts being written? I imagine the info publicly available as of now could make a great "fictional" movie. I bet there's a movie in the works already.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top