henrydm
New Member
loooks like its making good progress, l wonder how much COVID delayed it
I don't recall hearing any mention of Eglinton until about 2006 or 2007. AMT was discussing the LRT from Central to the 30 back in 2002 publicly.
??? I love Montreal, and I've stated previously. But the grass isn't always greener. And Toronto certainly needs to learn the lesson that building above-ground faster than below ... which we'll also see demonstrated on Finch vs Eglinton. But somehow we've forgotten that on Eglinton West.I almost half anticipated some kind of reaction from you on this, given your highly predictable and routinely negative opinion of Montreal
It was an old freight spur for many years. I seem to recall greater plans once, with thoughts of using it to divert Toronto trains away from the 2&20 into the Mount Royal tunnel.That West Island RoW must have been an old railway RoW.
It was an old freight spur for many years. I seem to recall greater plans once, with thoughts of using it to divert Toronto trains away from the 2&20 into the Mount Royal tunnel.
Recall also that construction on the new LRT link over the St. Lawrence had already begun by the time the Caisse became involved. Toronto needs to take this lesson, and where possible put LRT on the surface or elevated, like Montreal.
Testing starts in a few weeks.Du Quartier station looks almost finished, with platform screen doors already installed and catenaries up and ready.
??? I love Montreal, and I've stated previously. But the grass isn't always greener. And Toronto certainly needs to learn the lesson that building above-ground faster than below ... which we'll also see demonstrated on Finch vs Eglinton. But somehow we've forgotten that on Eglinton West.
There's very little new rail tunnel on this Montreal project - mostly on the link Dorval Airport - which is also the only part of the plan that came about very quickly. Recall also that construction on the new LRT link over the St. Lawrence had already begun by the time the Caisse became involved. Toronto needs to take this lesson, and where possible put LRT on the surface or elevated, like Montreal.
It was an old freight spur for many years. I seem to recall greater plans once, with thoughts of using it to divert Toronto trains away from the 2&20 into the Mount Royal tunnel.
Buses - glad they came to their senses. How early was that, by 2002 the AMT website said they'd been studying LRT since 1999 - https://web.archive.org/web/20021021040622/http://www.amt.qc.ca/grandsprojets/SLR/index.aspThe original plan for the Champlain bridge was bus lanes in the centre - this was later changed as REM came into focus.
In 2013,, the Quebec government formally requested that the new Champlain bridge be designed for LRT, not buses.Buses - glad they came to their senses. How early was that, by 2002 the AMT website said they'd been studying LRT since 1999
Quebec recommends express buses on new Champlain Bridge in 2018
Poeti said Thursday that he is not convinced a light rail train is the best option. He says estimates suggest a commuter would only save about three minutes in crossing the bridge by train compared to taking an express bus.
Testing starts in a few weeks.
I thought that was my point. The main tunnel section was already built a century ago. Little point tunneling under the river or in the median of a highway. And from Central to the river, it's mostly alongside other already-elevated structures and/or in industrial areas. And no point tunneling to Nun's Island.I think the point can be made that the beauty and intelligence we see here is precisely that *it contains so little new tunneling* ...
But then Doug Ford would have to look at the poors on the subway while driving his SUV, and we can't have that!I think the point can be made that the beauty and intelligence we see here is precisely that *it contains so little new tunneling*, there's no reason the entirety of say the TYSSE couldn't have been elevated, same for Eglinton West.