News   Nov 22, 2024
National Housing Day: City of Toronto and Riverdale Co-op Open Affordable Homes
 650     1 
News   Nov 22, 2024
Bauhaus Condos Rising in Toronto's Old Town
 1.1K     5 
News   Nov 22, 2024
49-Storey Waterfront Tower Proposed at Spadina and Queens Quay
 3.1K     8 

General cycling issues (Is Toronto bike friendly?)

Towered said:
Bay already has bike lanes...
Click to expand...

Not along its full length, proposal here is King to Davenport area initially with an eye to further north.

Bike lanes along any of these streets involves cutting traffic lanes. Bay has TTC service which may complicate matters.
 
TossYourJacket said:
Church makes the most sense to me in terms of adding bike lanes, no buses, doesn't impact the streetcar track in the centre lanes. Could also widen the sidewalks in the Village at the same time if you're cutting street parking to make space for the bike lanes.
Click to expand...

Agree on all points. However I would also include University Ave as well, because why not? It should be entirely doable (8 lanes of traffic, curb lanes are only used for street parking most of the time), and would really help fill in the gap in the central area of downtown.

Here's a map of what this could look like alongside the existing network. New bike lanes shown in orange could go on:
- Yonge street north of Davenport
- Bloor street (closing the gap between Avenue Rd and Sherbourne) - this is already planned
- Church St + an extension of the Davenport Rd bike lanes
- University Ave from Bloor St to Adelaide (anything beyond Adelaide may be unfeasible due to reduced road width)


Screen Shot 2019-10-09 at 3.59.53 PM.png
 
TossYourJacket said:
Church makes the most sense to me in terms of adding bike lanes, no buses, doesn't impact the streetcar track in the centre lanes. Could also widen the sidewalks in the Village at the same time if you're cutting street parking to make space for the bike lanes.
Click to expand...
TTC doesn't like running streetcar tracks on 1 lane roads - in service or out of service. This may be problematic for Chuch between Front and Carleton.. but the TTC may have to make an exception.
 
salsa said:
Agree on all points. However I would also include University Ave as well, because why not? It should be entirely doable (8 lanes of traffic, curb lanes are only used for street parking most of the time), and would really help fill in the gap in the central area of downtown.

Here's a map of what this could look like alongside the existing network. New bike lanes shown in orange could go on:
- Yonge street north of Davenport
- Bloor street (closing the gap between Avenue Rd and Sherbourne) - this is already planned
- Church St + an extension of the Davenport Rd bike lanes
- University Ave from Bloor St to Adelaide (anything beyond Adelaide may be unfeasible due to reduced road width)


View attachment 208279
Click to expand...

Since University Avenue is downtown, there is no need for on-street parking, since there are many, many off-street parking garages. Should consider using a common parking garage sign.

parkingsign.jpg

From link.
 
Last edited:
Why not build out Bay St. down to Front St. with well protected bike lanes? Seems to offer the best connection to important locations (Eaton Centre, City Call, Financial District and Union Station)!
 
Church also has the disadvantage of not connecting to the MGT and waterfront (unless the city somehow manages to extend it under the rail corridor one day).
 
I would prefer them on Bay. Its kind of like the middle of what we already have existing. It connects best and could be taken all the way down to queens quay easiest.

A few issues with church, it is pretty close to sherbourne, it doesn't go past the Gardiner so there is no chance in the future to connect to the waterfront. Ryerson is hoping to narrow the street between Gerrard and Dundas to make it safer for students. It is a long time in the future but currently one of the busiest intersections at the school and will only get busy with Ryerson's expansion to Jarvis and Dundas.

The only thing about church I like is it has the least amount of car traffic currently so just remove on street parking and it wouldn't affect that much.
 
smably said:
Church also has the disadvantage of not connecting to the MGT and waterfront (unless the city somehow manages to extend it under the rail corridor one day).
Click to expand...
The city does actually have a plan to fix this. Not sure when it would happen though, but plans have been made.

reteequa said:
I would prefer them on Bay. Its kind of like the middle of what we already have existing. It connects best and could be taken all the way down to queens quay easiest.

A few issues with church, it is pretty close to sherbourne, it doesn't go past the Gardiner so there is no chance in the future to connect to the waterfront. Ryerson is hoping to narrow the street between Gerrard and Dundas to make it safer for students. It is a long time in the future but currently one of the busiest intersections at the school and will only get busy with Ryerson's expansion to Jarvis and Dundas.

The only thing about church I like is it has the least amount of car traffic currently so just remove on street parking and it wouldn't affect that much.
Click to expand...
IMO we should have them on both Bay and Church. It's funny how there's a common belief that bike lanes are a thing we can have too many of in an area, unlike road lanes or sidewalks (which are things that obviously make sense on basically every street). As for Ryerson, if you were to remove the street parking lane, there should be space to both widen the sidewalk for students as well as include bike lanes, plus I'm sure students who bike to campus would appreciate being able to use the bike lanes.
 
Bay street does have the waterfront connection, but my one concern is the amount of auto traffic on it, especially through the financial core. It's only a 20m ROW between Queen and Front Street, and that stretch is absolutely clogged with cars. If you reduce it to 1 lane each way, as well as pedestrianize Yonge, you are really going to significantly reduce auto capacity into the core. A bit of capacity reduction is fine, but I'm worried that would be "catastrophic".

Church is relatively lightly traveled comparitively, and would be a much easier conversion because of that. But maybe I'm just biased since I live on Church :D
 
innsertnamehere said:
Bay street does have the waterfront connection, but my one concern is the amount of auto traffic on it, especially through the financial core. It's only a 20m ROW between Queen and Front Street, and that stretch is absolutely clogged with cars. If you reduce it to 1 lane each way, as well as pedestrianize Yonge, you are really going to significantly reduce auto capacity into the core. A bit of capacity reduction is fine, but I'm worried that would be "catastrophic".
Click to expand...
My thoughts exactly. And for the waterfront connection, you can use the existing bike lanes on Yonge street and use The Esplanade to go between Church and Yonge Street.

208419




That being said, I generally detest these kind of choppy, indirect cycling routes that are forced on us and are so common all over this city. But since someone decided we cant have bike lanes on Yonge for some reason.... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 
innsertnamehere said:
Bay street does have the waterfront connection, but my one concern is the amount of auto traffic on it, especially through the financial core. It's only a 20m ROW between Queen and Front Street, and that stretch is absolutely clogged with cars. If you reduce it to 1 lane each way, as well as pedestrianize Yonge, you are really going to significantly reduce auto capacity into the core. A bit of capacity reduction is fine, but I'm worried that would be "catastrophic".

Church is relatively lightly traveled comparitively, and would be a much easier conversion because of that. But maybe I'm just biased since I live on Church :D
Click to expand...
I used to ride Bikeshare every day from Parliament and Richmond, down Bay to Union. The annoying thing wasn't the moving cars, but the illegally parked cars and especially buses sitting in the curb lane outside the buildings. I wish Toronto had a much more aggressive tag and tow policy and TPS force.
 
innsertnamehere said:
Bay street does have the waterfront connection, but my one concern is the amount of auto traffic on it, especially through the financial core. It's only a 20m ROW between Queen and Front Street, and that stretch is absolutely clogged with cars. If you reduce it to 1 lane each way, as well as pedestrianize Yonge, you are really going to significantly reduce auto capacity into the core. A bit of capacity reduction is fine, but I'm worried that would be "catastrophic".

Church is relatively lightly traveled comparitively, and would be a much easier conversion because of that. But maybe I'm just biased since I live on Church :D
Click to expand...

The problem with Church is the streetcar tracks between Carlton and Wellington Streets. This limits the ability to play with the road configuration, such as what was done on Bloor, allowing for parking and left turn lanes in sections.

It's a lot easier to play with Yonge Street.
 
You must log in or register to post here.

Back
Top