TOareaFan
Superstar
Because of the GTS we will be seeing all-day 2-way service between Union and Mount Pleasant by the end of the year. The issue is a shortage of engineers, trains, and scheduling. But it wouldn't have happened without GTS.
Which year? The fiscal year in which it was promised (which is just a moving promise from before GTS was planned) ends on March 31....think it has pretty well been accepted that it is not happening by then and the promise will slide forward.
Not to mention the UPX, as well as grade separation that was required for electrification, GO RER, Smarttrack.
If you are going to mention UPX then you have to take my $1.3B figure and add in about $450MM more because it had it's own budget. I could have phrased my comment like this "they spent $1.75B on the corridor and the only tangble benefit we have yet to see is the UP"
Just because a project doesn't yield immediate results doesn't mean it was not worthwhile or needed.
I never once said it was not worthwhile or needed...it was absolutely needed...but only in the context of actually providing service.....the post I was responding to was one that was comparing the relative abilities of ML and TTC in transit planning/building. The fact that ML spent a whack of money on a project that took 5 years and could not plan ahead during that time to have the staff to run the trains to take advantage of that spend is hardly something that a supporter of them should tout as a "positive".
None of the aforementioned can happen without the GTS work that took place.
No doubt...but most of it hasn't happened with it either