I was checking out the City of Toronto
DineSafe site tonight--while thinking about this recurring thread-- and it occurred to compare the frequency of "conditional pass" results for all the popular coffee chains in Toronto.
For each, I just compared the total number of locations returned on a search for the company name against the number of results for that company that have received "conditional pass" inspection results. Then I calculated a rough Percentage of Conditionals, basically the percentage of locations that have had conditional passes. Higher is bad.
Of course this is not scientific, and is based only on the results I happened to get today (Aug 4 2008 around 8pm) dating back as far as the results go, which seems to be mid 2006. Keep in mind that "conditional" violations can be for a number of things, some quite minor (sink a few inches too far from food prep area, couldn't find required paperwork, etc) and some more alarming (infestations, refrigerators too warm, unclean equipment and surfaces, food stored on floor, etc.) In general these issues seem to be corrected within a day or so and the stores remain open. Most have received several clean passes since.
The results are interesting, though not particularly shocking based on my personal expectations and the anecdotal stories I've read in this thread and elsewhere. Here they are, "best" to "worst"....
STARBUCK'S
Total Locations: 100
Conditional Passes: 3
Percentage of Conditionals: 3.0%
TIM HORTONS
Total Locations: 233
Conditional Passes: 17
Percentage of Conditionals: 7.3%
TIMOTHY'S
Total Locations: 54
Conditional Passes: 8
Percentage of Conditionals: 14.8%
COUNTRY STYLE
Total Locations: 58
Conditional Passes: 12
Percentage of Conditionals: 20.7%
SECOND CUP
Total Locations: 97
Conditional Passes: 22
Percentage of Conditionals: 22.7%
COFFEE TIME
Total Locations: 104
Conditional Passes: 31
Percentage of Conditionals: 29.8%
So, the bottom line in relation to this thread? If you visit a Coffee Time in Toronto at random, you have a just under 1 in 3 chance that it has (temporarily) failed a health inspection over the past couple years, which is substantially worse than your odds at nearly any other chain.
The big shock? Second Cup... as a "higher end" chain I view more in comparison to Starbuck's, their results are surprisingly poor.
The no brainer? Tim Horton's. They seem clean, and they are, apparently.