News   Nov 22, 2024
National Housing Day: City of Toronto and Riverdale Co-op Open Affordable Homes
 340     1 
News   Nov 22, 2024
Bauhaus Condos Rising in Toronto's Old Town
 759     4 
News   Nov 22, 2024
49-Storey Waterfront Tower Proposed at Spadina and Queens Quay
 2K     6 

2018 Ontario Provincial Election Discussion

jje1000 said:
Talking points:

https://www.ontariopc.ca/peoples_guarantee
Click to expand...

Forgotten was the (*)asterisk and disclaimers!

This disclaimer does not cover misuse, accident, lightning, flood, tornado, tsunami, volcanic eruption, earthquake, hurricanes and other Acts of God, neglect, damage from improper reading, incorrect line voltage, improper or unauthorized use, broken antenna or marred cabinet, missing or altered serial numbers, removal of tag, electromagnetic radiation from nuclear blasts, sonic boom, crash, ship sinking or taking on water, motor vehicle crashing, dropping the item, falling rocks, leaky roof, broken glass, mud slides, forest fire, or projectile (which can include, but not be limited to, arrows, bullets, shot, BB’s, paintball, shrapnel, lasers, napalm, torpedoes, or emissions of X-rays, Alpha, Beta and Gamma rays, knives, stones, etc.).
No license, express or implied, by estoppel or otherwise, to any Intellectual property rights are granted herein.
Cute Fuzzy Bunny (CFB) disclaims all liability, including liability for infringement of any proprietary rights, relating to use of information in this specification. CFB does not warrant or represent that such use will not infringe such rights. In fact, that’s a very strong possibility.
Nothing in this document constitutes a guarantee, warranty, or license, express or implied. CFB disclaims all liability for all such guaranties, warranties, and licenses, including but not limited to: fitness for a particular purpose; merchantability; non-infringement of intellectual property or other rights of any third party or of CFB; indemnity; and all others. The reader is advised that third parties may have intellectual property rights that may be relevant to this document and the technologies discussed herein, and is advised to seek the advice of competent legal counsel, without obligation to CFB. In other words, get your own #$^%#$ lawyer before you hurt yourself.
These materials are provided by CFB as a service to his friends and/or customers and may be used for informational purposes only. Single copies may be distributed at will since it is unlikely that CFB created this material independently as he has no creative skill.
TRADEMARK INFORMATION: CFB and the CFB logo are registered trademarks of CFB.
CFB's trademarks may be used publicly with permission only from CFB. Fair use of CFB's trademarks in advertising and promotion of CFB products requires proper acknowledgment. If you use CFB’s trademarks without CFB’s express approval, he will get really pissed off.
*All other brands and names are property of their respective owners.
OWNERSHIP OF MATERIALS: Materials are copyrighted and are protected by worldwide copyright laws and treaty provisions. They may not be copied, reproduced, modified, published, uploaded, posted, transmitted, or distributed in any way, without CFB's prior written permission, which is freely granted as long as you take CFB’s name off in some lame attempt to either hide the materials origin or in the hilarious belief that the receiver of this material will think that you created it on your own, or somehow will think you more clever and intelligent that you really are. Except as expressly provided herein, CFB does not grant any express or implied right to you under any patents, copyrights, trademarks, or trade secret information. Other rights may be granted to you by CFB in writing or incorporated elsewhere in the Materials.
DISCLAIMER: THE MATERIALS ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTY OF ANY KIND INCLUDING WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, NONINFRINGEMENT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE. IN NO EVENT SHALL CFB OR HIS SUPPLIERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, BUSINESS INTERRUPTION, LOSS OF INFORMATION) ARISING OUT OF THE USE OF OR INABILITY TO USE THE MATERIALS, EVEN IF CFB HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. BECAUSE SOME JURISDICTIONS PROHIBIT THE EXCLUSION OR LIMITATION OF LIABILITY FOR CONSEQUENTIAL OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES, THE ABOVE LIMITATION MAY NOT APPLY TO YOU. CFB further does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information, text, graphics, links or other items contained within these materials. CFB may make changes to these materials, or to the products described therein, at any time without notice. CFB makes no commitment to update the Materials. In other words, if you screw it up, you’re on your own.
​
Batteries not included!
 
Brown is wise to drag the Conservatives back to the centre (centre-left relative to where they've been the past couple of decades).

I'm not sure what the Liberals can do to compete with what seems like a reasonable platform.
 
syn said:
Brown is wise to drag the Conservatives back to the centre (centre-left relative to where they've been the past couple of decades).

I'm not sure what the Liberals can do to compete with what seems like a reasonable platform.
Click to expand...
Its worth noting how appealing the PC platform is to an undecided moderate centrist.

At least, I know many people who are going to be really pleased with Hydro cuts, increased daycare and lowering the lowest brackets for marginal taxes.

Its the most Red Tory platform since Bill Davis.
 
Interestingly, the document shies away from social justice and social policy in general.

There's a lot of talk about families and economic issues - it really does seem like the perfect centrist platform for them.
 
WislaHD said:
Its worth noting how appealing the PC platform is to an undecided moderate centrist.

At least, I know many people who are going to be really pleased with Hydro cuts, increased daycare and lowering the lowest brackets for marginal taxes.

Its the most Red Tory platform since Bill Davis.
Click to expand...

I consider myself an independent centrist and this does have some appeal.
 
That platform has no appeal whatsoever because it is deceitful. I want to know where they will get the money for all this, and especially their proposed tax cut, which would provide savings of $1500 for a person with a taxable income of $75,000. There will be massive cuts in other areas. The real "change" is to keep quiet about this, unlike Hudak during the last election, hoping people will be impressed with their faux left platform. It seems to be working so far.
 
Bayer said:
That platform has no appeal whatsoever because it is deceitful. I want to know where they will get the money for all this, and especially their proposed tax cut, which would provide savings of $1500 for a person with a taxable income of $75,000. There will be massive cuts in other areas. The real "change" is to keep quiet about this, unlike Hudak during the last election, hoping people will be impressed with their faux left platform. It seems to be working so far.
Click to expand...

This is my concern as well. All the "gives" look great, but they need to go into detail on what they're going to take away to pay for it all. Any cuts to healthcare or education are completely unacceptable, and if they make cuts to any other areas they'll have to be major.
 
ttk77 said:
This is my concern as well. All the "gives" look great, but they need to go into detail on what they're going to take away to pay for it all. Any cuts to healthcare or education are completely unacceptable, and if they make cuts to any other areas they'll have to be major.
Click to expand...

According to the 2017 Ontario Budget, health, education (including advanced education), and social services represent 70% of total expenses. I don't see how cuts in those areas can be avoided.
 
Bayer said:
According to the 2017 Ontario Budget, health, education (including advanced education), and social services represent 70% of total expenses. I don't see how cuts in those areas can be avoided.
Click to expand...

Agreed. That's why I singled them out. I'm actually surprised it's only 70%. I'd assumed it was even higher than that.
 
Bayer said:
That platform has no appeal whatsoever because it is deceitful. I want to know where they will get the money for all this, and especially their proposed tax cut, which would provide savings of $1500 for a person with a taxable income of $75,000. There will be massive cuts in other areas. The real "change" is to keep quiet about this, unlike Hudak during the last election, hoping people will be impressed with their faux left platform. It seems to be working so far.
Click to expand...

I'm no fan of Patrick Brown, nor recent incarnations of the provincial party; but I think using the word deceit , relative to what other parties have put out in the past is a word too strong.

There are certainly some details where the words are carefully chosen (for instance a commitment to finish the EA for the GTA West Corridor, but no funding commitment for construction.); and others
where certain items that are omitted may be of interest (including itemized savings).

But its hardly uncommon for every party to assume there is some 'low-hanging fruit', programs with little or no constituency, assumed increases for certain programs that may be avoidable, or even some genuine productivity gain.

I find parts of this platform to be very problematic (including the middle-income tax cut and further small-business rate tax reductions)
amongst other things.

But deceit, I'm not there.....yet.

****

ps. they do have a cost assumption equal to 2% 'efficiency' as I recall.

Which on a budget of about $130B would roughly equal their proposed spend. (again if memory serves)
 
ttk77 said:
Agreed. That's why I singled them out. I'm actually surprised it's only 70%. I'd assumed it was even higher than that.
Click to expand...

It would be closer to 78% of program spending after removing the interest on the debt from total expenses.
 
I don’t think the PC promise list adds up either, but I don’t see how it adds up worse than the > $200 billion shortfall under the sitting Liberal government.
 
You must log in or register to post here.

Back
Top