Even Mainstreet. Wow indeed.
Even Mainstreet. Wow indeed.
Their AI software analysis projects....wait for it...Libs getting just one seat! Not even official party status. And it won't be Wynne either.If you haven't watched this, you should:
There were good reasons why Tory and Hudak weren’t good enough. In Tory’s case it was funding for religious schools, while for Hudak it was mass layoffs of civil servants. In both cases, the PC’s had a leader grossly out of step with the desires of a majority of Ontarians. The fault was with the party, not the electorate, and at this point it looks like the polarizing leadership choice they made with Ford will continue their well-established tradition of snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.In 2007, John Tory wasn't good enough, so McGuinty was returned - thus began the lost decade when Ontario debt increased by over 100% (while Canada only up 26%). Shortly thereafter, everyone regretted their decision.
In 2011, Tim Hudak wasn't good enough, so McGuinty was returned and that spawned the many arms of the Gas Plant Scandal. Shortly thereafter, everyone regretted their decision.
In 2014, Tim Hudak wasn't good enough, so Wynne was returned and that spawned the many arms of the political corruption, cash-for-access, etc. Shortly thereafter, everyone regretted their decision.
History does have a way of repeating itself. I have no doubt that voters will regret their choices. Back in the Bob Rae era, it was hard to find 10% of people who actually voted for him.
The Cons were the party of the little guy and farmers.
Serendipity:Provincially, it may be argued that the OLP played that role at least into the Peterson era. The Big Blue Machine PCs were the "cosmopolitans".
EDITORIAL
Globe editorial: Doug Ford can’t ignore allegation he tried to sell bogus party memberships
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opi...ford-cant-ignore-allegation-he-tried-to-sell/
Their AI software analysis projects....wait for it...Libs getting just one seat! Not even official party status. And it won't be Wynne either.
But projections show that the NDP has to win ridings from the Cons, not the Libs, to win.
Ford has no seat, you can’t lose what you don’t have. We can certainly hope that Shafiq Qaadri keeps his riding - the only Liberal I’ll be rooting for.I hope that he’s obliterated and loses his own seat..
I have no issue voting NDP now that they have momentum.
Im strategic voting as well. I know you were trying to get us to join your don't vote campaign but I think its fair to vote strategically for other people. Im in Mike Colles area and would tend to vote for him. On the other hand if its close and I can give even more to the NDP I have no problem doing that. I think going from Liberal to NDP or vice versa is no where near as drastic as going from red/orange to blue. In principle the Orange and Red have plenty in common. So voting for them doesn't mean that you are changing your ideology to cast a winning vote.This shit again. "Looks like they might win, better vote for them."
I'm not singling you out, you're by far not the only one who casts votes based on perceived winnability.
Putin gets half his votes like this, you know. (I'm not even having a laugh here, it's true).
Ford has no seat, you can’t lose what you don’t have. We can certainly hope that Shafiq Qaadri keeps his riding - the only Liberal I’ll be rooting for.