crs1026
Superstar
Single point are traditionally easier to install and maintain in city pavement, more reliable in the sense that there is only one place that foreign material can jam the points, but less reliable in the sense that it's easier for the wheels to pick the switch. I wonder whether improvements in street construction (@W.K.Lis's photos contrast a very modern double point trackbed, versus old-school single point in ashphalt) makes double point more practical for street cars too..... not that TTC would give up its old school ways without a fight.
The premise of LRT is operating like subway: shut the doors, accelerate, go full speed to the next station, brake, open the doors, repeat.
Anything that disrupts that cadence - track switches, u-turn lanes, red traffic lights - is a recipe for slower service and a 'streetcar mentality'.
On Crosstown, track switches ought to be a non-issue - there are fewer of them, and dual point on a segregated row should be navigable without a stop. (Will Crosstown have traffic control, like the subway? If so, the operator will comply with a signal, versus worrying about the switch points per se)
More stops won't help, but the biggest risk is that traffic lights will force operators to coast or stop between stops. Building in U-turn lanes, as is being proposed for Eglinton West, actually increases the number of intermediate potential stopping points. Inadequate U=turn merge lanes could leave autos lingering on the tracks until everything ahead has moved on. If this is allowed to become the norm, 'coasting' habits will form and schedules will be padded.
I hope the line is managed from the subway control organization - and not as a surface line.
- Paul
The premise of LRT is operating like subway: shut the doors, accelerate, go full speed to the next station, brake, open the doors, repeat.
Anything that disrupts that cadence - track switches, u-turn lanes, red traffic lights - is a recipe for slower service and a 'streetcar mentality'.
On Crosstown, track switches ought to be a non-issue - there are fewer of them, and dual point on a segregated row should be navigable without a stop. (Will Crosstown have traffic control, like the subway? If so, the operator will comply with a signal, versus worrying about the switch points per se)
More stops won't help, but the biggest risk is that traffic lights will force operators to coast or stop between stops. Building in U-turn lanes, as is being proposed for Eglinton West, actually increases the number of intermediate potential stopping points. Inadequate U=turn merge lanes could leave autos lingering on the tracks until everything ahead has moved on. If this is allowed to become the norm, 'coasting' habits will form and schedules will be padded.
I hope the line is managed from the subway control organization - and not as a surface line.
- Paul
Last edited: