Surprise stadium recommendation on the table
http://www.thespec.com/News/Local/article/802359
Facilitator offers new stadium site, seeks delay
Alternative at Red Hill and Lincoln Alexander Parkway
July 06, 2010
JOHN KERNAGHAN
(Jul 6, 2010)
West harbour or east Mountain: that's the short list of Pan Am stadium sites the city and the Tiger-Cats have identified in a facilitator's draft report.
A copy of the draft report obtained by The Spectator also calls for an extension of the deadline to select a final site for the 2015 Games from Friday to Aug. 31.
The proposed east Mountain location had not previously been cited as a possible stadium site. It's located at the intersection of Red Hill Valley Parkway and Lincoln Alexander Parkway at the Mud Street-Stone Church Road East interchange.
The report by facilitator Michael Fenn, which asked for comments from the parties and could change when presented to council tomorrow, recommends the city consider acquiring the property immediately while moving ahead with land assembly at the west harbour.
Fenn is recommending the city confirm to Games officials and the federal and provincial governments it will build a 24,000- to 26,000-seat stadium at one of the sites with a final decision Aug. 31.
That extra time would allow the city to continue negotiations with the Edmonton-based Katz Group, which is interested in bringing a National Hockey League team to Hamilton and operating a Pan Am
stadium in the west harbour as part of an entertainment complex.
The city and the Cats hit an impasse in May when Ticats owner Bob Young rejected the city's preferred west harbour location. He later called for a facilitator to referee talks between the two sides.
City council is expected to be asked to adopt that recommendation tomorrow. Sources at City Hall confirmed the report focuses on a second east Mountain site.
Toronto 2015 CEO Ian Troop has previously called for a firm location by Friday, noting "we're sticky on timing."
When reached by The Spectator yesterday, Troop said he would not comment until the report was final.
The east Mountain site is owned by the Ontario Realty Corporation, a public body that manages land for the Ontario government.
That location emerged at a "mature" stage of talks, Fenn wrote, after neither the city nor the football club could produce a detailed proposal for an alternative.
The report said the east Mountain option came into focus after a presentation by the Ontario Realty Corporation "late in the process."
The city's support for the second site was qualified, calling for possibly lowering the city's $45-million commitment to a stadium at that location in order to shift some funding to downtown and waterfront projects. But the Mountain location answers some of the Tiger-Cats' needs, including easy automobile access and high visibility for sponsors.
The city's favoured west harbour location near Bay and Barton streets would allow redevelopment of a brownfield site.
Much of Fenn's report centred on the "driveway to driveway" experience to attract Ticat ticket buyers.
The west harbour location would offer about 600 parking spots. An estimated 6,800 spots are needed for a 22,000-person stadium event -- 3,900 spots within one kilometre and another 2,800 within a 15-minute walk.
Fenn also recommended:
* the city ask to consult with Pan Am officials on how the facility, which will host track and field in 2015, can accommodate a track and produce an "outstanding legacy facility" for football;
* add 15,000 temporary seats to host a Grey Cup game;
* complete technical studies of both sites by Aug. 12 to understand their limitations and involve the Ticats in those studies;
* involve the Tiger-Cats in exploring third-party interests in operating the stadium and related property development;
* ask Infrastructure Ontario to move ahead with the requests for qualification process, which seeks out planning and architectural firms.
Fenn also called on the city to look at talks with the federal and provincial governments to link stadium plans with waterfront development, support GO transit terminals at west harbour and a Queen Elizabeth Way east gateway as well as seek funds to cover seating needs beyond the 15,000 required for the Pan Am Games.
KEY STATEMENTS FROM THE FACILITATOR'S DRAFT REPORT:
* "If the public comments of leading Pan Am Games officials are considered, there is apparently a real risk of losing the potential Pan Am investment as well as the Hamilton stadium and Pan Am events."
* "Hosting a Grey Cup on a periodic basis would be very beneficial to the economy and reputation of Hamilton."
* "An element of scarcity in seating availability (at a stadium) is potentially positive from a marketing standpoint and it reduces avoidable capital costs."
* "Future success (for the Ticats) appears to depend on increased suburban and ex-urban attendees and more ticket sales in the higher-priced segment of the market."