News   Jul 12, 2024
 423     0 
News   Jul 12, 2024
 481     0 
News   Jul 12, 2024
 266     0 

1233 Queen East | ?m | 8s

A 10km line with a ridership of 25,000 is not one of the lowest ridership on the planet. It's doing quite well considering it's one small line.
2,300 riders per km is quite well? The Coxwell bus weekday service is only 2.1 km long and gets about 6,600 riders on a weekday. That's over 3,000 riders per km. 2,300 is roughly the riders/km of the Dawes Road bus!
 
read the posts on the last page.. they are for Lagos nigeria, but were seen in buffalo. thus the talk about the buffalo subway.
 
Would not recommend those H5 or H6 for Buffalo.

Sarcasm.

Buffalo does actually have a subway line (with some of the lowest ridership for any metro network on the planet) but it runs on the surface downtown.
25,000 riders a day is pretty abysmal considering the yonge line is 15km and is regularly pushing 35,000 people PER HOUR.
Not surprising considering that Buffalo has a population of only 260,000. Mississauga, Brampton, Vaughan and Richmond Hill all have larger populations. Even if everyone in Buffalo took their metro twice a day it would be mathematically impossible for it to move 35,000 per hour.
 
The cars would have to be adapted for overhead power collection.

Yes they can go to a pantograph system easy, but the real problem is the current platforms.

Other than the platform for the front door to meet accessibly laws, all the other doors are open by the riders where a set of stairs will fold out. Some time the driver will activate tall the doors.

To used the H5 & H6 cars, all the stops will have to become high floor platforms with a gap between it and the LRV so traffic can get by them without interference. That money neither the system has nor the city to do this period.

Regardless of the ridership numbers, the US builds lines for low numbers that we would not and only use buses for them. Then what is the operation cost using buses vs. LRT/Metro compared to the capital cost in the first place?

This is one line where the $1 invested in it didn't get the $10 to $1 return, considering the city is only haft the size now compare to what it had when the line was built.
 
Yes they can go to a pantograph system easy....

Except for the very minor problem of the structure of the cars not being designed for weight up there. And in fact, that is one thing that Halton County found out with their G cars, despite the fact that they are much more overbuilt than the H cars.

So no, you can't just mount a pantograph up there easy.

Dan
Toronto, Ont.
 
Sarcasm.



Not surprising considering that Buffalo has a population of only 260,000. Mississauga, Brampton, Vaughan and Richmond Hill all have larger populations. Even if everyone in Buffalo took their metro twice a day it would be mathematically impossible for it to move 35,000 per hour.

Markham has over 300,000 people, more than Buffalo. Richmond Hill has over 180,000 people. However, the figures for the Buffalo MetroRail (which is an LRT line) also includes those from the likes of Kenmore, Amherst, Lackawanna, Cheektowaga, and Fort Erie.
 
Last edited:
Markham has over 300,000 people, more than Buffalo. Richmond Hill has over 180,000 people. However, the figures for the Buffalo MetroRail (which is an LRT line) also includes those from the likes of Kenmore, Amherst, Lackawanna, Cheektowaga, and Fort Erie.
The greater Buffalo area is over 1.2 million, on par with New Orleans ... Albany, or Rochester. And about the same as Ottawa, Calgary, or Edmonton.
 
Except for the very minor problem of the structure of the cars not being designed for weight up there. And in fact, that is one thing that Halton County found out with their G cars, despite the fact that they are much more overbuilt than the H cars.

So no, you can't just mount a pantograph up there easy.

Dan
Toronto, Ont.

You know that as well as I do, but the poster needs to understand its not a simple change over to go from rail to pans or do what he thinks can happen. Wouldn't recommend this at all.
 
You know that as well as I do, but the poster needs to understand its not a simple change over to go from rail to pans or do what he thinks can happen. Wouldn't recommend this at all.

I am fully aware it's not a simple task, nor did I imply they should be converted to pans for use on an LRT line.
 
Markham has over 300,000 people, more than Buffalo. Richmond Hill has over 180,000 people. However, the figures for the Buffalo MetroRail (which is an LRT line) also includes those from the likes of Kenmore, Amherst, Lackawanna, Cheektowaga, and Fort Erie.

You can't compare populations between city districts in US and Canada.. districts are drawn completely differently. The size of buffalo city proper would almost fit into markham twice.
 

Back
Top