arvy
New Member
I really like Vienna & Geneva; could live in any of those cities. Pretty much agree with the top 10. As far as North America's west coast, I would rank it Vancouver/Seattle/Portland. The report had Portland ahead of Seattle.
A bit ironic to hear that Asian cities have good schools, after last year.
My experience is that Japanese cities have many of the qualities you mention. I do not believe that most other Asian cities have good access to healthcare (in China, there is very little access, I understand). Their crime rates are low, especially in Japan, but in China most crime seems to be done by the party and there is no recourse for that kind of activity. I would rather live in a place with a functioning justice system, as well.
Frankly, I haven't seen an Asian city that I would prefer to Toronto. Seoul came closest, I guess, there was something about it that I really cared for a great deal. But they tend to be a bit ugly as well.
According to the article, they ranked the cities on '30 factors across 5 areas: stability, healthcare, culture and environment, education, and infrastructure.'
I don't think anything I wrote above is arguable....
Hahahaha... I love this line.
Why does being on a river make a city more liveable than being on a Great Lake? Or a Pacific Ocean? Or... in the case of Calgary... a different river? (I have taken a Bateaux-Mouche on the Seine, but I'd much rather take an inflatable raft down the Bow from Bowness to the weir, swim off Woodbine, or jog along English Bay.)
Really? They seem rather ridiculous to me... and bias towards North American cities.
Can someone explain why Toronto/Calgary/Vancouver would be higher than Munich? Or Paris? Or Dusseldorf?
These cities have far better arts, health-care, and public transportation.
Health care in Germany is not socialized.
What do you mean by that? Almost everyone in Germany has some basic coverage.
I think it's interesting that when we think about opportunity we first think career opportunity. This is definately a key issue but I don't think it is at the heart of the matter.
Take a city like Zurich for instance. I was born there and I am comfortable saying that the quality of life under many measures, many of which are mentioned here is just superior to a place like Toronto. That said there is just something missing in Zurich and many other european cities. You can live there and maybe get an OK job, the place takes care of you fairly well and provides a top notch standard of living but in the end you just don't have much say or sense of purpose in the whole relationship. Everything is just so regulated and established.
Opportunity is not just about getting a job, it's about being able to pursue the initiatives that are important to you. Look at the mechanics of how people end up taking on initiatives and become successful in any endeavour from business, to art, to creating a family and home for themselves. These things all require such things as inspiration, chance influences, a network of like-minded individuals, room to grow, the flexibility to make mistakes and time to learn from them, a tolerant establishment, a dynamic and shifting cultural and demographic backdrop etc. I could go on but then I would be writing someone's book on the subject for them.
Yes transportation, social programs, cultural funding, etc. etc. are all important and wonderful and measurable but they are not ends in themselves, they only matter so far as the impact and opportunities they provide for people to realize their aspirations in this world.
But it's not like Canada's health care system. It's single payer. You're right it's basic with many people opting for private insurance. It's the sort of health care system the U.S. will eventually adopt (not Canada's model).