BurlOak
Senior Member
I haven't thought about interlining at Pape, but maybe for Sheppard.Line 2 trains going down Line 4 at Pape would be even better than just having the interchange station there.
Would trains still stop at the interchange stations if they're interlined? If so, wouldn't thus require station platforms to be in specific angles that allow for tunnels to connect further off? Or if they don't, then just have tunnels that merge together? How exactly does this work at St George, Bay, and Museam?
There is more than 1 way to skin a cat. I imagined the Sheppard West Station on the Sheppard Line being somewhat away from the Sheppard West Station on the Spadina line. You are right that there is no need for actual transfers there. I would connect them by tunnel - sort of Spadina Station style transfer. Having the stations separated, makes for easier construction as a complex station does not have to be built under an active station. It's much easier to build a simple tunnel under a station. What I show has one conflict between WB to SB trains conflicting with SB to EB (which requires less frequent train movements than a conflict on the main Spadina portion). All others are grade-separated, and these would be built in the middle of a field, where there is ample room for construction.