No. You're manipulating everything to try and make what I think about these events look ridiculous.. Give me a break!
Nothing is being manipulated, you are just constantly failing to answer. I am challenging you to provide a detailed, clear and logical account of your conspiracy, and verifiable evidence to support your claims. You've only offered vacant musings, stories, poorly formed questions, your "feeling" and unsubstantiated beliefs.
I'm trying to get people to look outside the box and consider what i have to say and have shown.
As noted earlier, you fail to have the open mind you claim to because you adhere to your beliefs which are completely unsupported by any evidence.
You won't offer proof for the side you're defending.
As as been noted repeatedly, I am not defending any position here. You have failed to read through the thread to see this. What I am challenging you to do is to support the numerous assertions you have made throughout this thread with actual verifiable evidence. You have failed to do so.
You keep making the same stupid argument over and over.
If you dislike the repetition, start producing your evidence and an account that can be investigated and verified/refuted. Your little You Tube paranoia festival does not constitute evidence. It's quite clear that you have no knowledge as to what verifiable evidence is. A big hint here Kamuix: it's not your feelings or your beliefs.
You don't address important things that I ask.
You haven't addressed anything important. You have failed to provide any evidence whatsoever to support your claims. Start producing the evidence or admit that your claims are baseless and without foundation.
You've made up your own rule that because I made a claim I must show absolute evidence.
Providing evidence to support an assertion is not my rule Kamuix. It is a basis for rational arguments and carrying out investigation. Conspiracies must be shown to exist by way of evidence, not the nebulous feelings you personally experience.
How the hell can you try and turn me not showing government controlled absolute proof into it being a tooth-fairy level of belief?
I'll try to answer your poorly-phrased sentence: without any verifiable evidence and without any reasonable account to support your claims regarding a conspiracy, your feelings and beliefs are not better than a tooth fairy story.
It just shows that you have an agenda and shows exactly what it is.
No agenda here, just demanding that you produce evidence to support your claims. Your feelings are clearly upset because you are frustrated that you have absolutely nothing to offer to support your assertions. You just can't bring yourself to admit that you are wrong.
I'm not offering what i say as absolute proof.
Actually, that is exactly what you are asking. You simply want people to believe in your assertion that there is some sort of conspiracy because you have some vague feelings in that regard. Yet you offer nothing in the way of reasonable or verifiable evidence to indicate that there is any sort of nefarious conspiracy in play. With respect to proof, you don't need the qualifier of "absolute to be included in your sentence; you have offered no proof whatsoever.
And yes it could be argued that because i didn't personally read official report that i perhaps should, I wouldn't necessarily call it narrow-minded, you're narrow minded.
Kamuix, it's blatantly obvious that because you did not read the report you have no idea what's in it, and as a result, are in no position to refute its content. To repudiate it on the basis of your ignorance is hypocritical and completely unreasonable. You fail to comprehend this.
Also obviously neither of us have read it, and I feel that I've seen more then enough to know that the official report was BS. You are completely unwilling to discuss this.
As noted, I am not defending anything. I am challenging you to support your claims with evidence. Your suggestion that the report you refer to (not that you have ever once named it) is all "BS" is farcical - since you have never read the actual report. Your information of it comes by way of the secondary mickey-mouse conspiracy fairy tales you so religiously adhere to. If you really want to understand the report, you should get an actual copy and start reading it. Otherwise, you have no knowledge regarding its content.
All you do is use an impossible question ...
Nothing remotely impossible about me asking you to support your claims with evidence. What appears to be impossible is for you to actually provide a detailed account of what you contend took place, and the verifiable evidence to support those claims. You find it impossible because you have nothing at all to offer.
Don't you think it's a little weird that just because i don't show what you call "evidence" That suddenly I'm a crazy delirious person who's making up fairy tails built on nothing?
I think it's weird that you adhere to your vague beliefs in light of the fact that you have zero to offer in the way of proof to support your claims. You have not even read the report you claim is in error, yet you repudiate it in full. You simply expect others to be open-minded based on your otherwise unexplained, foggy and paranoid feelings.
It's one thing to say "you don't have proof so no one knows for sure if your information is credible" but to do what you're doing shows you've already built up a hate and we've been over you're unwillingness to be open-minded, in other words think outside the box and to quit letting your ignorant emotions get the better of you. I know there's other forum readers who understand what i mean.
About the "proof" part, you have failed to provide any - regardless of how many times you have been challenged to do so. As for the open-minded part, you have offered no verifiable proof or supportable account that is of interest. In fact, you have offered no evidence whatsoever, and simply want others to share in your unsubstantiated paranoia. Moreover, you have illustrated that your mind is quite closed when you continue to adhere to some vague conspiracy belief without any clear evidence or detailed account to back up your position.
I don't hate you Kamuix, but I think your position is ignorant, unreasonable and certainly indicative of paranoia. You have called others "moron" on this thread, and have now suggested I "suck it," but that is because you feel slighted at the fact that your emotional musings have been brought into serious question.
The way to address this Kamuix is to provide verifiable evidence to support your claims, and a detailed account of what you assert took place. I continue to challenge you to do this.
I just happen to think Islamic terrorists are too crude to plan this event alone. Look at those pathetic things they call rockets lobbed into Israel from Palestine, or the messy bombings in other parts of the world. Failures. I refuse to believe these Taliban and Saudi guys could plan anything so advanced. If it looks unbelievable, it probably is unbelievable.