gristle
Senior Member
And yet again, all you said in all of your separate responces was the same thing worded differently and I already gave you a responce to it. And accusing me of not responding to do which I most obviously did...
Because you have failed to answer the direct challenge: do you have verifiable evidence to support your conspiracy claims regarding government involvement in the events of 9/11? So far you presented nothing and you plainly evade the obvious fact that you don't have any such supporting proof.
Either start producing the evidence or finally admit that you have none and that your accusation is baseless and founded on your own personal paranoia.
You automatically consider things like the 9/11 commission report to be evidence because it was released by the US government and shown to us in the media, that's proof to you.
If someone claims that something or many things in that report are not true, they must show evidence.
K'moo, as a propagandist, you really are a minor leaguer. I'm not defending evidence of any kind. I am challenging you to produce YOUR evidence that supports YOUR claim of a government conspiracy. The evidence should be verifiable - something that can be examined by all, and verifies a systematic government involvement - as you claim. If you don't have that, then you can't assert the existence of a conspiracy. That must be proven. Conspiracies don't exist simply as a function of your ability to fantasize.
If you want to refute the Commission Report, you have to first read it so as to know what's in it. You haven't done that. Then you have assemble a body of evidence that can refute the information contained within it. You haven't done that. Then you have to produce evidence that supports your conspiracy claim. You haven't done that. So far, you have failed to even describe the nature of this conspiracy you claim exists, never mind produce one iota of proof for its existence. Forget logic, there is neither reason nor content to your accusation.
Do you see what i'm saying? According to you whatever evidence I show you must be backed by the government.
According to you whatever evidence I show you must be backed by the government.
You want media/government backed evidence, THAT'S the problem.
As I have repeated to you over and over again: verifiable evidence. I have never specified "government" or "media" evidence. You're the one who keeps qualifying the sources. Don't blame me if you are too stupid to understand this. The fact is Kammy, you simply do not understand what evidence is, nor are you capable of shaping a reasoned, evidence-based argument. That's why you hide behind this excuse.
What's more, it's pretty clear that you repeatedly cite "government" and "media" because you have no knowledge of any other sources of information, knowledge or evidence. You have no evidence of your own that can support your baseless accusations and your only recourse otherwise is disbelief or paranoid accusations. This would suggest that, as much as you hate the government and media, you are profoundly attached to them. You're hatred of them gives you meaning. Without them, you'd be nothing.
So where is your verifiable evidence K'moo? You know, something that proves your accusation and illustrates the existence of a conspiracy. Some attestation and substantiation that we all can see and examine.
More than ten years on and you can't produce a single shred.
Pathetic!