animatronic
Senior Member
I wouldn't be so sure that's her tweeting anymore. I suspect Lisi etc took over her account.
If so, then Lisi is a master of human observation. The tone and syntax haven't changed.
I wouldn't be so sure that's her tweeting anymore. I suspect Lisi etc took over her account.
I suspect they might have realized that picture might not endear them to their current and potential clientele. Questions of judgement, and so forth.
Plus I think he'd be using it more frequently. I actually believe she's in rehab, her tweeting has been very sparse since she went for help.If so, then Lisi is a master of human observation. The tone and syntax haven't changed.
I wouldn't be so sure that's her tweeting anymore. I suspect Lisi etc took over her account.
If so, then Lisi is a master of human observation. The tone and syntax haven't changed.
While she said herself someone else tweeted that stuff about me and my bro. And only Sandro would know about that info. The stuff her account was private messaging me is totally different that what the account is tweeting publicly now.
Ann Hui @annhui 1m
Mayor Ford's spox says he's in "offsite meetings" today. He's released a statement saying he's taken TO back from "edge of a fiscal cliff"
Let's see how this plays out...
"Ummm Lawsuits and Slander and Evidence. If you sue you get cross EXAMed about ANYTHING. If I was Blair.."
https://twitter.com/DavidPylyp/status/499382444274233344
Rob Ford is in "constituent meetings" this morning, according to his staff.
This person does not know what he is talking about.
This person does not know what he is talking about.
A court decides two things in a defamation case. First, whether a statement (written or spoken) was defamatory and, second, what damage was caused by the statement. So, it's possible to win a defamation suit but not get any damages because the defamation did not cause financial harm, (roughly speaking). Back when I was school studying the basics of this stuff, we were told stories gangsters who won defamation suits but received no damages because their reputations were already so low, they couldn't really be harmed by comments that lowered their reputation in the community. Not sure if those were true or not.)
In Blair's case, he'll probably argue DoFo's statements were designed to damage his professional reputation, which impacts his ability to find other work etc. These would be specific and general damages. I think a judge can also award punitive damages in Ontario, but I'm not 100% sure.
Apologies themselves are not antidotes in defamation case. If they are prompt and sincere, a court will consider them as mitigating factors, but they won't get you off the hook. So, even if Doug apologizes, Blair can still proceed with the suit. As to whether Doug gets his ass handed to him, well, that's a matter for the courts to decide.