EVB: Agree here again - I always felt that what was Metro's six boroughs - The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto - is what made up the City - as it stands unified today -
and that surrounding areas outside the Toronto City (or Metro-then) boundary was what I considered the "suburbs"...LI MIKE[/QUOTE
I'm going to second/third(?) this opinion. maybe someone who lived in the old City of Toronto may think differently.
Yes. Thinking differently that is.
We set out in '97 or whatever it was (fog of time) to lay a banner across the bridge that straddles the Allen at Eglinton. It said, "Welcome to Toronto. A Democracy Free Zone." The feeling at the time, and it does linger still, is that this was forced upon us. Further, we could see the political reasons for it and thought it both cynical and deplorable (though we never in our most feverish imaginations saw Ford coming.) Anyway, cops saw us. Stopped the event and dutifully read from the applicable codes which we were about to contravene, suggested we reconsider and sternly warned us off. We got back on the subway and headed back downtown. Which is where the bulk of us had grown up. In retrospect, we should've been more prescient. Should've known our little fairyland of relatively cheap houses, an empty free zone where 'Liberty Village' is now, empty warehouses and such wouldn't, couldn't hold.
We should've become ruthless and speculated (not that we could afford it).
Having been a downtown kid from the 70's forward, it's at once kinda disheartening and, at the same time, kinda cool, to see these changes going on (minus the Ford debacle obviously). The urbanization is good. The 'we deserve subways' crap is toxic. Amalgamation probably made great fiscal sense but, as someone suggested above, there were other 'borough' models that ought to have been considered. There was no suburban resentment pre-amalg, but it's only increasing now. This great division lies squarely at Ford's plodding feet, having been calved off Mike Harris' shoulders.