Johnny Au
Senior Member
Why would a Ford troll be named after two products known to cause lung cancer?
He/she is cancer to anyone with an IQ over 100.
He/she is cancer to anyone with an IQ over 100.
|
|
|
Rob Ford's Toronto
- Thread starter MetroMan
- Start date
- Status
pud99
Senior Member
Link to Statement of Claim (doc appears to be too large to attach to a post in this thread): http://www.scribd.com/doc/203256511/Rob-Ford-Statement-of-claim-issued-2014-01-29
the lemur
Senior Member
Attachments
pattycakes
Senior Member
Thanks. Listened to it again, Rob calls the guy brother, so we can assume he's black, probably was Payman. Looks like all of Rob's "friends" taped him while wasted, I almost feel sorry for him. Almost.
Mongo
Senior Member
Jonathan Goldsbie @goldsbie 6m
Kaboom. RT @nowtoronto Here is a complete copy of the mind-blowing lawsuit filed against Rob Ford today: Lawsuit alleges Ford ordered jailhouse beating
Kaboom. RT @nowtoronto Here is a complete copy of the mind-blowing lawsuit filed against Rob Ford today: Lawsuit alleges Ford ordered jailhouse beating
greenegg
Active Member
Probably to cover their own asses.
the lemur
Senior Member
He's linked to one address in Rexdale that might fit the description (https://sites.google.com/site/therobfordfiles/associates/known-associates-of-ford/payman-aboodowleh).
k10ery
Senior Member
Murder rant video: Before March 19, 2012 - according to Scott MacIntyre
Beating: March 22, 2012
Ford's visit to Metro West: March 25, *2013*
I'm not buying this. Let's remember the source of the claim is not exactly reliable either.
If the murder rant video is about Scott MacIntyre, then the off camera comment "These kids are pros buddy" does not make sense.
Also, in the video, the off camera voice says "After you win the by-election...". That would place it around the time of the conflict of interest decision that was supposed to boot Ford from office - between November 2012 and January 2013. Too late to be about a beating in March 2012.
This doesn't mean that the beating wasn't to protect Ford, but I don't see a smoking gun.
Mongo
Senior Member
From the Statement of Claim:
Liability of Ford, Aboodowleh, and Petros
55. Ford, Aboodowleh, and Petros conspired among themselves and with others whose identity is known to them but not known to the plaintiff, to arrange for the attack on the plaintiff and to cause him serious harm. In particular, Aboodowleh, acting as Ford's agent and with Ford's explicit or tacit approval, contacted Petros and Williams and instructed them to send a message to the plaintiff, first in the form of threats of physical harm, and then in the form of a brutal assault and battery of the plaintiff.
56. Ford and Aboodowleh arranged for persons employed by MWDC, whose identity is known to Ford and Aboodowleh but not known to the plaintiff, to facilitate the exposure of the plaintiff to Petros, and to facilitate the attack on the plaintiff on March 23, 2012, and more particularly, to arrange for the plaintiff’s detention in range 1B, and to ensure that there was no supervision or surveillance of the area where the plaintiff was assaulted.
57. Petros agreed to and ultimately did carry out the instructions of Ford and Aboodowleh, or in the alternative arranged for others to do so.
58. The various matters set out in paragraphs 55 to 57 above and elsewhere in this statement of claim were the subject of communications between the defendants during visits by Ford and Aboodowleh (or either of these) to MWDC, and on calls and messages sent and received by the defendants on their mobile telephones.
59. Ford and Aboodowleh knew that the plaintiff would suffer physical harm as a result of their actions, which included instructing Petros to send a message to the plaintiff that he should not expose Ford's illicit drug use or his association with criminals.
60. As a result of the conduct of the defendants, or the conduct of those for whom the defendants are liable, as set out above, the plaintiff has suffered damages as set out above.
61. The conduct of the defendants, or those for whom they are vicariously liable, is sufficiently reprehensible, oppressive and high-handed so as to justify the court's denunciation with an award of exemplary damages, and further justifies penal damages.
Liability of Ford, Aboodowleh, and Petros
55. Ford, Aboodowleh, and Petros conspired among themselves and with others whose identity is known to them but not known to the plaintiff, to arrange for the attack on the plaintiff and to cause him serious harm. In particular, Aboodowleh, acting as Ford's agent and with Ford's explicit or tacit approval, contacted Petros and Williams and instructed them to send a message to the plaintiff, first in the form of threats of physical harm, and then in the form of a brutal assault and battery of the plaintiff.
56. Ford and Aboodowleh arranged for persons employed by MWDC, whose identity is known to Ford and Aboodowleh but not known to the plaintiff, to facilitate the exposure of the plaintiff to Petros, and to facilitate the attack on the plaintiff on March 23, 2012, and more particularly, to arrange for the plaintiff’s detention in range 1B, and to ensure that there was no supervision or surveillance of the area where the plaintiff was assaulted.
57. Petros agreed to and ultimately did carry out the instructions of Ford and Aboodowleh, or in the alternative arranged for others to do so.
58. The various matters set out in paragraphs 55 to 57 above and elsewhere in this statement of claim were the subject of communications between the defendants during visits by Ford and Aboodowleh (or either of these) to MWDC, and on calls and messages sent and received by the defendants on their mobile telephones.
59. Ford and Aboodowleh knew that the plaintiff would suffer physical harm as a result of their actions, which included instructing Petros to send a message to the plaintiff that he should not expose Ford's illicit drug use or his association with criminals.
60. As a result of the conduct of the defendants, or the conduct of those for whom the defendants are liable, as set out above, the plaintiff has suffered damages as set out above.
61. The conduct of the defendants, or those for whom they are vicariously liable, is sufficiently reprehensible, oppressive and high-handed so as to justify the court's denunciation with an award of exemplary damages, and further justifies penal damages.
pud99
Senior Member
Jado
Active Member
I've always wondered, what is the context of the above photo of Ford, that he would be making that facial expression? Anyone know the origin of the photo?
Franks2000inchTV
Active Member
Could be the "kids" in jail who would be carrying out the beating.
OSS 117
Senior Member
Yeah, and calling MacIntyre a "racist fuck" seems to fit too. And the drug talk about Randy carrying a purse, which implies someone who knew the family.
pud99
Senior Member
McIntyre's lead lawyer for the lawsuit, Sean Dewart, or at least someone at his firm, is acting for the complainant in the most recent complaint about Ford improperly using City resources.
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news...-rob-fords-use-of-staff-filed/article16276108
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news...-rob-fords-use-of-staff-filed/article16276108
pud99
Senior Member
The first published appearance seems to be here: http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2013/06/27/rob-ford-ontario-liberals_n_3510927.html
- Status