One of the most common and valid critiques of the left in Canada and elsewhere is to note a particular susceptibility to narcissism. It manifests as the unexamined conviction by the left-leaning that their views represent higher moral truths rather than simply their own subjective preferences.
Therefore to question their conclusions or to represent different values is seen not as a valid challenge to a particular perspective, but rather as a rejection of goodness and decency itself. The standard response from the left to a different point of view is to assume the person is either evil, stupid or perhaps from the Alberta.
In her column, Carol Goar blithely exemplifies these traits with stereotypical sanctimony. She arrogantly bemoans the “passivity of the population.” Her contempt for “the people” is clear as she scolds them for not “asking questions, seeking alternatives, discussing the consequences of this pared-down agenda.”
Apparently she views the population as child-like simpletons who are “not equipped to gauge the severity of global risks or judge how much belt-tightening is needed to insulate Canada from them.” In short, Ms Goar has concluded that Canadians are simply too stupid, lazy and amoral to challenge the evil agenda of the government.
Of course, there is the possibility that Canadians aren’t stupid at all. It could be that by and large they think the government is on the right track with this. But such intellectual generosity and objectivity is probably expecting too much from those who so shamelessly indulge in conflating their own personal values with “the value system Canadians once shared.”
Michael Harris, Toronto