News   Apr 24, 2024
 886     1 
News   Apr 24, 2024
 1.2K     1 
News   Apr 24, 2024
 603     0 

Metrolinx: Other Items (catch all)

The media will gravitate to the issues it understands best: Kirby Station and LRV procurement.

But on first read of the AG report, my reaction was that the most scathing criticisms land in the area of contractor management and project management. It’s a very straightforward laying down of the law around Project Management 101. Which aligns perfectly with what a lot of people in the industry (some of them being said consultants) have been saying.

I hope the media and pundit types pick up on this. We know what Ford’s respone will be.... ie replace senior people at ML with some of his best friends. The better question is, what will it take to get ML to a better place in how it manages big projects. The AG report certainly bites ML where it deserves to be bitten.

. Paul
 
The media will gravitate to the issues it understands best: Kirby Station and LRV procurement.
I hope the media and pundit types pick up on this.
I think the Globe and Star at the very least will hit targets with their shots:
Auditor finds Metrolinx spent $237-million to rescue Crosstown light-rail project


OLIVER MOORE URBAN TRANSPORTATION REPORTER (Globe)
PUBLISHED DECEMBER 5, 2018UPDATED 4 HOURS AGO
COMMENTS
Metrolinx agreed to spend nearly a quarter of a billion dollars to get its troubled Crosstown light-rail line back on track without proof from the project’s builders that the additional costs were legitimate, Ontario’s Auditor-General has found.
In an annual report issued Wednesday, Auditor-General Bonnie Lysyk revealed new details about the lengths Metrolinx, the province's transit agency, had to go to get assurances the Crosstown would be finished on time in 2021.
The details come at a time when the province – led by Premier Doug Ford – has been arguing for months that Toronto cannot build transit efficiently and effectively, and that this role should be taken over by Queen’s Park.
Ms. Lysyk’s report does show that changing transit plans cost hundreds of millions over the last decade, buttressing Mr. Ford’s argument that decisive action is needed. And she lays out out details about former transportation minister Steven Del Duca’s intervention in Metrolinx’s transit planning, illustrating the agency’s willingness to bend to its political masters.
But she also paints a picture of Metrolinx spending more than expected, at times without sufficient oversight or planning. She found the agency agreed to a higher price per transit vehicle to settle a contract dispute, allowed consultant costs to burgeon and permitted work to start, and in some cases be finished, before being approved.

Ms. Lysyk looked in detail at the Crosstown LRT, now being built along Eglinton Avenue in midtown Toronto, and found evidence of a contract so weak that Metrolinx couldn't hold the consortium of private construction companies to account for looming delays.

The Crosstown is one of the largest transit projects in Canada. It is being being built by a consortium of ACS-Dragados, Aecon Group, EllisDon and SNC-Lavalin as a public-private partnership. While the model in theory requires the private sector to absorb risk, the question of who is responsible for problems can be contentious.

According to the auditor, Metrolinx had “limited remedies" as long as the builders claimed the project would be finished on time. Metrolinx had increasing concerns about hitting the 2021 deadline but did not pursue them due to the consortium’s assurances.

Then, in February, 2018, the consortium filed a notice of delay, seeking a one-year contract extension and compensation for delays it alleged were the fault of Metrolinx.

Metrolinx and the construction consortium eventually settled for $237-million and a renewed commitment to finishing the project by September, 2021.


Ms. Lysyk found, though, that the consortium’s claim did not include evidence that Metrolinx was responsible for the delays.

“Metrolinx agreed to a settlement amount … but did not ask the [private] consortium for documentation to support the claim amount,” she concluded.

In its written response to the Auditor-General’s report, Metrolinx pledged stronger contracts in the future: “Should further claims be submitted, Metrolinx will ensure the claim-review process linking the allegations to the details observed on the ground is thoroughly documented.”


[...]
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/pol...-spent-237-million-to-rescue-crosstown-light/
 
Rail negotiations keep Guelph, Kitchener out of Metrolinx expansion plans
NEWS Dec 06, 2018 by Graeme McNaughton Guelph Mercury

Note: This story has been clarified from a previous version, following comment from Metrolinx CEO Phil Verster

The province’s transit agency got its first look at bringing faster, more frequent trains to GO Train stations across the province — but Guelph is not included.

“The item going to board this week on the GO Expansion program does not apply to the plans that are underway to provide two-way, all day service to Kitchener,” Phil Verster, Metrolinx’ s CEO, says in a statement emailed to the Mercury Tribune.
https://www.guelphmercury.com/news-...-door-for-two-way-all-day-go-service-by-2024/
“Increasing service and getting to two-way all day service to the Kitchener/Waterloo Region is a priority for us. We continue to make good progress on our work with CN on negotiating when we can add service on existing infrastructure.”
Verster added that more information on future service levels on the line will be coming in the next year to 18 months.
The program Verster referred to saw its full business case presented to the Metrolinx board Thursday afternoon. That plan would turn GO Transit’s train lines across Ontario into a rapid rail system.
Under that system, trains would run every 15 minutes, with infrastructure upgrades bringing trains that run 30 per cent faster and are 50 per cent cheaper to operate, thanks to electrified tracks.
The business case projects that the Kitchener line would see this upgrade come between 2025 and 2030.
While that increased service is coming to the Kitchener line, where Guelph sits, the rapid transit stops in Brampton.
According to a concept design included in the business case, Guelph would see one trip per hour to Toronto during peak morning hours, between 6 and 9 a.m., via a diesel-powered train. However, during that same time, six electric trains per hour would be going both ways between the Bramalea station in Brampton and Toronto’s Union Station.

A second concept design, showing the amount of trips during off-peak hours, does not include Guelph.

In his email to the Mercury Tribune, Verster says the proposed extensions along the Kitchener line, which includes Guelph, are not incorporated in this business case as it falls under a different business case, funded as separate programs. There is also another hurdle in the way of expanding those services.

“The practical reason why these extensions are not included in this GO expansion business case is because these extensions are so dependent on the negotiations with CN and CP as Metrolinx does not fully own the tracks for the planned extensions including the extension to Kitchener,” he says.

“Until these are resolved, we cannot really schedule the completion date or properly determine the final scope of the program.”

The planned upgrades on the Kitchener line between Bramalea and Union, according to Metrolinx, is expected to cost $1.93 billion, with $930 million of that going towards corridor and fleet costs.

The remaining $1 billion would go towards operation and maintenance costs.

The discussion of bringing two-way, all-day GO train service to Guelph and on to Kitchener has been a longtime promise on the provincial level, with the Ontario Liberals pledging to bring that service within 10 years during the 2014 provincial election.

In March 2017, the federal government announced that it would be contributing $752 million to go toward improving rail infrastructure along the Toronto-Kitchener rail corridor on the way to all-day train service.

That money is to be used to build just over 40 kilometres of new track between the Mount Pleasant GO station in Brampton and Toronto’s Union Station, along with two grade separations, new parking areas, train layover areas and improvements to bridges.

Stations along the Toronto-Kitchener corridor would be getting funds for upgrades from that money as well.

While that money would not make a difference to those riding the rails today, former Waterloo Region chair Ken Seiling told the Waterloo Region Record at the time that “it’s really one part of the larger puzzle … that advances the ability to bring two-way GO trains to Kitchener.”

In May, Guelph councillors voted 9-2 in favour of joining Waterloo Region and the City of Kitchener on calling provincial party leaders to commit to bringing two-way, all-day GO service from Toronto through to Waterloo Region, with a stop in Guelph, by 2024.
https://www.guelphmercury.com/news-...h-kitchener-out-of-metrolinx-expansion-plans/
 
Weekday GO Train Service To Niagara Region

From link.

For the first time ever, GO Transit is introducing year-round weekday train service between Niagara Falls and Toronto.​
The official announcement was made today (Dec. 14) during an event in St. Catharines, Ont.​
The inaugural weekday trip will depart from Niagara Falls at 5:24 a.m. on Jan. 7. That GO train will make stops in St. Catharines and at the West Harbour station in Hamilton, before continuing on to Toronto.​
The first weekday evening GO train trip to serve St. Catharines and Niagara Falls, will depart from Union Station at 5:15 p.m. that same day.​
Metrolinx President and CEO Phil Verster said he’s thrilled to introduce this new service.

“Regular weekday GO trains have never operated out of Niagara Falls or St. Catharines before,” said Verster. “This is new territory and a sign of more great things to come.”

The delivery of weekday GO train service to the Niagara Region, years earlier than originally promised, is a direct result of the strong working relationship between Metrolinx and CN.

“This service is proof of the great things that can happen when you work collaboratively with your partners,” said Metrolinx, Chief Planning Officer, Leslie Woo. “This incremental service expansion is a symbol of our renewed drive to grow mass transit and do things differently.”

There are currently plans to open two additional GO stations along the Niagara corridor: Construction at Confederation GO in Stoney Creek is already underway and the proposed Grimsby GO station is now part of Metrolinx new Transit Oriented Development strategy. Work in Grimsby will now advance in collaboration with third-party investments and will be delivered in partnership with the local municipalities and property developers.

The investment in additional weekday GO train services to and from the Niagara Region is expected to cost about $1.66 million annually.

When using PRESTO, the train fare between Niagara Falls and Union Station will be $19.80. Without PRESTO, the train fare between Niagara Falls and Union Station will be $22.30.
 
You have to wonder if a high-speed ferry wouldn't be cheaper and faster?
Environmentalists would complain because it'd use fuel oil or something stupid like that. It'd definitely be more scenic, and probably more enjoyable to the general public, but it doesn't help people going to Hamilton/Burlington. I'm curious to see how the public reacts.
 
In Hong Kong, there are concerns of High Speed Ferries harming wildlife. With regards to the fuel oil thing, I have some environmentalist friends who ranted about fuel oil and ships.

I don't see something wrong with the idea of a ferry, but I guarantee people will complain regardless of what happens in Niagara Falls.
 
Maybe to the few people heading to Toronto on a daily basis. But what about most of the others that aren't?

Dan
Toronto, Ont.
At that time in the morning? 05:24? It's a bit moot for any destination save for a handful of zombie work units. And what time does it arrive back?

Take the bus, and leave the driving to Gus. It runs every hour, at a time most people are awake and normal, and stops at places in a normal manner.
https://www.gotransit.com/static_fi...g/FullSchedules/01092018/24092018/Table12.pdf
 
Last edited:
At that time in the morning? 05:24? It's a bit moot for any destination save for a handful of zombie work units. And what time does it arrive back?

Take the bus, and leave the driving to Gus. It runs every hour, at a time most people are awake and normal, and stops at places in a normal manner.
https://www.gotransit.com/static_fi...g/FullSchedules/01092018/24092018/Table12.pdf

No, the point is that most of the people boarding at Niagara Falls are not likely to be heading to Toronto for work. They will be heading to Hamilton, or Burlington, or Oakville. A ferry wouldn't help them at all.

Dan
Toronto, Ont.
 
No, the point is that most of the people boarding at Niagara Falls are not likely to be heading to Toronto for work. They will be heading to Hamilton, or Burlington, or Oakville. A ferry wouldn't help them at all.

Dan
Toronto, Ont.
Maybe so, but how is that train at 5:24 going to help more than a few people get to work in "Hamilton, or Burlington, or Oakville"? That train is going to be running virtually empty in the morning, and perhaps a few more riders in the evening return.

It's what the Brits term a "Ghost Train", although the true meaning of the term is a "Parliamentary Train" (a legal quirk to retain the rights to the route when not running any trains save as little as one a week in some cases.)

This is Ford's "Ghost Train" to make the claim he's improving life For The People, when the bus does it better, more often and faster. And already exists.
 
No, the point is that most of the people boarding at Niagara Falls are not likely to be heading to Toronto for work. They will be heading to Hamilton, or Burlington, or Oakville. A ferry wouldn't help them at all.
If that's who is going to be riding this new service, I'm not sure how a train that arrives near downtown Hamilton at 6:40 AM and departs back at 6:30 PM is going to help them! Working 9 to 5 ... that's more like 7 to 6!

For those departing Niagara Falls at 5:19 AM, there isn't even any traffic to slow them down if they are heading to Hamilton!
 

Back
Top