crs1026
Superstar
Sorry, but I stand by my language of choice. Nothing but a highly insidious form of puritanism could be the driver behind the banning of electric personal transport, whether it be only at one condo corporation or in the entire city, or the advocating of same, and if it is not most people in the city, it is enough to affect the governance of the city in a material way (see also: e-scooters being banned). If we used the same logic currently being used against electric personal transport, we wouldn't have trains or planes or cars, which were all fairly sketchy at best in their early forms. Every technology in its infancy is going to encounter some difficulties, and instead of trying to work through that as a society we'll just ban it and hope it goes away.
"If the only tool you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail" should be the city's official motto.
And yet, the only EVs I see pushback against are personal transport. I don't see any of this energy being used against electric cars and buses, I don't see the TTC threads being flooded with concerns about the flammability of the nearly 400 e-buses they've just ordered, despite there being quite a few high profile e-bus fires in the last couple of years, I don't see city council trying to stop the TTC from ordering these machines.
Which is it: are electric vehicles dangerous and should be banned, or are electric vehicles dangerous and should be banned unless their batteries are large enough and powerful enough to move a 12 m bus?
I don't consider myself puritanical, nor do I advocate outright banning of the devices. There is much room for middle of the road solutions.
Bringing highly flammable battery devices into an enclosed public spaces has some obvious safety concerns. It so happens that e-mobility devices have greater amounts of flammable metals and greater amounts of stored energy than cellphones or laptops.... so yes I would say they deserve more scrutiny and possibly greater regulation.
E-vehicles may have even greater risk of fire, but the escapability from such an event is very different than from a fire on a subway car or heavy railcar in motion.
Seems to me the issue demands careful study. Calling for outright bans, and knee-jerk reaction to such calls, are equally unhelpful.
Can we get back to reasonable debate and seeing each others' points of view ?
- Paul




