News   Dec 20, 2024
 3.2K     11 
News   Dec 20, 2024
 1.2K     3 
News   Dec 20, 2024
 2K     0 

GO Transit: Construction Projects (Metrolinx, various)

Not often I ask for updates..........but I'm curious to know if anyone has seen the state of the Highland Creek culvert area work for the Stouffville line.

If the answer is yes, great, if not, perhaps @TwinHuey might indulge with a look-see.

I checked from the train earlier this week and didn't see any progress. I wonder if this work is even still planned for this year?
 
Not often I ask for updates..........but I'm curious to know if anyone has seen the state of the Highland Creek culvert area work for the Stouffville line.
I'm pretty sure a new signal tower went up north of the bridge a month or 2 ago. Around that time we were discussing there being some construction activity over a weekend and I think after that I noticed the signal tower. I've been meaning to do my yearly flyover but haven't had the time yet.
 
IMG_7988.jpeg
 
Lakeshore East express in August.

They haven't put any of the new spans in along the Ontario subway corridor for them to run on yet.
They don't need to. The existing express track between Danforth and Guildwood is long enough for an express train to overtake a local already.
 
They don't need to. The existing express track between Danforth and Guildwood is long enough for an express train to overtake a local already.
Perhaps I'm wrong, and there will be express Lakeshore East trains in August (or September). Time will tell - but I doubt there will be.
 
Perhaps I'm wrong, and there will be express Lakeshore East trains in August (or September). Time will tell - but I doubt there will be.

Time is very fluid in such a big project, and from the sidewalk it sure looks like much has yet to be done......but because shifting the GO tracks out of their current alignment is mission critical to making progress on the Ontario Line, I have confidence that GO will be back to three tracks sooner than later.

- Paul
 
Grading work for the second track has been completed in the vicinity of Downsview Park station, but it is positioned in a way that makes it unusable.
IMG_20240616_152604294_HDR.jpg


The station is designed for 3 tracks with two side platforms, so in the interim 2-track configuration there needs to be a gap between the northbound and southbound tracks, like at Rutherford.

You can see that the grading for the second track is not adjacent to the future second platform:
IMG_20240616_152612192_HDR.jpg


For the second track to be built where the grading was done the second platform would need to be extended east, but the bridge abutments over Sheppard Avenue recently built to support the second platform reflect the original design with space for 3 tracks, not a design with the platform shifted east. (See photos by @ProjectEnd ).

This is not really a problem but it means that the grading near Downsview Park station has effectively not been done because it will need to be redone in the correct location before the second track can be installed.
 
Last edited:
Time is very fluid in such a big project, and from the sidewalk it sure looks like much has yet to be done......but because shifting the GO tracks out of their current alignment is mission critical to making progress on the Ontario Line, I have confidence that GO will be back to three tracks sooner than later.
But returning three tracks into service would make shifting the tracks for Ontario Line construction much harder.

Having only two tracks in service in the future 6-track corridor gives them more room to have a buffer between the construction zone and the active tracks. So I would assume that they are in no hurry to return three tracks into service until the embankment work is complete.
 
But returning three tracks into service would make shifting the tracks for Ontario Line construction much harder.

Having only two tracks in service in the future 6-track corridor gives them more room to have a buffer between the construction zone and the active tracks. So I would assume that they are in no hurry to return three tracks into service until the embankment work is complete.
The project plan that I saw for the corridor does call for the third track returning to service with the shifting of the tracks to the new southerly alignment. It was originally supposed to happen in October, but it isn't clear to me whether that schedule will still hold.

That schedule also didn't list East Harbour, so I'm not aware if the third track will be able to continue through that construction site.

Dan
 
The vision was 3 tracks to Galloway, but future-proofing for 4 tracks to Durham Junction. A future third track was also planned east of there to the Bowmanville extension, interchangeably being shoehorned north of the Kingston Sub and overtaking the northern CN track and building a new one for freight on the south side. But that was 10+ years ago, things were in flux, and I know there was a lot of hand-wringing about the lack of a third track progressing for the eastern MSF at that time. Incredible it is taking this long.
 
The vision was 3 tracks to Galloway, but future-proofing for 4 tracks to Durham Junction. A future third track was also planned east of there to the Bowmanville extension, interchangeably being shoehorned north of the Kingston Sub and overtaking the northern CN track and building a new one for freight on the south side. But that was 10+ years ago, things were in flux, and I know there was a lot of hand-wringing about the lack of a third track progressing for the eastern MSF at that time. Incredible it is taking this long.

Another facet of how keeping ML's plans secret, and not being transparent about when and why the scope has changed, is making ML ineffective.

- Paul
 
Another facet of how keeping ML's plans secret, and not being transparent about when and why the scope has changed, is making ML ineffective.

- Paul
I dislike Metrolinx’ “good news only” comms strategy but I don’t see what difference it makes to their effectiveness. Unless we think they are scanning forums like these for ideas to get them out of holes they dug themselves?
 
I dislike Metrolinx’ “good news only” comms strategy but I don’t see what difference it makes to their effectiveness. Unless we think they are scanning forums like these for ideas to get them out of holes they dug themselves?

Organizations that have this latitude to bury problemsand rewrite their commitments inevitably develop a disfunctional culture where problems are not candidly raised, discussed, analysed, and corrected.
Metrolinx is well down this road.
If the original version (take your pick) were documented as a "commitment", there would have been more accountability around scope and scope creep. Perhaps some of the iterations might not have been worked on. Perhaps more would have moved to execution. Perhaps wasteful redesign would have been avoided.
LSE is a good example of "ready, aim, aim, aim, aim....." paralysis - that's not indicative of an effective, results focussed organization.

- Paul
 
@Allandale25 posted this clip of the Mx Board Meeting elsewhere:


I'm not sure what's been reported out on timelines elsewhere and as a few are mentioned, I'm not going to search them all out.

But I made these notes:

1) Caledonia Station (Barrie GO) on target to start construction by year's end, with an in-service date of 3-4 years given.

2) Maple GO targeted for full-return of normal operations by Spring' 25

3) For Stouffville GO Line, there will be a major closure in July (this month) to upgrade signals at 5 at-grade crossings. New track near McNicoll has been commissioned.

There was a rather vague statement about a third and final commissioning phase for tracks works 'in the southern area, close to Scarborough Junction' (his words). That would be 'later this year'.

That would seem to suggest that the full twin track operation will be possible by late this year. @crs1026 may wish to listen to that bit at roughly 45:35 of the video.
 

Back
Top