Interesting though certain people can preach racism on twitter without any issues though...
I watched the Joe Rogan special with the Twitter CEO and moderation team and it was pretty much
"if you go after a protected class with racism that is automatically seen as targeted racism"
however, Joe then pointed out that you can be openly racist to white people on twitter and the Twitter team said that isn't really targeted racism lol
I think that is why a lot of people get upset how 'free speech actually works' because it seems one's free speech is determined by one's place on the hierarchy of oppression.
First, a point of clarification.
"Freedom of Speech" has a specific meaning; and it is not ' you may say anything, anywhere, anytime without consequence"
Rather, it is you may speak critically of the government without fear of reprisal by the state.
You don't go to Jail for disliking Liberals/Conservatives/NDP'ers etc.
What Twitter does with with its own platform is a private matter, not a public one; and its regulated by its owners, not the government, as expressed in in its Terms of Service.
****
That said, 'racism' against white people is not reasonable, likable or otherwise acceptable.
BUT
It really isn't the same thing, particularly in the United States as bashing a minority.
Outcomes in the United States (power, education, money, jobs) are still vastly better for those who are 'white' vs those who are 'black' (the principal minority in the United States).
One of those minorities is already far more likely to be jailed, far more likely to be a victim of discrimination, far more likely to be shot by police.
Given what has been seen at the U.S. southern border and notably with the recent shooting in El Paso, I would suggest life is also markedly worse for Hispanics in the United States (who would be labelled 'white' in any other part
of the world, but I digress).
Should their be a hierarchy of oppression? Of course not. But in the real world is one group more powerful than another, and one (or more) groups more likely to be victimized as a result of hateful rhetoric? The answer is surely yes.
That doesn't mean Twitter shouldn't (ideally) police all hatred inappropriate language with equal vigour.
But in the end, one is a slightly more pressing concern than the other, at least when taken in the aggregate.