Admiral Beez
Superstar
I predict Liberal majority. The Cons will implode, and the Dippers and Greens will cancel each other out. We are seeing the historic destruction of the NDP and the ascendency of the Greens as the third place party.
You might be right.I predict Liberal majority. The Cons will implode, and the Dippers and Greens will cancel each other out. We are seeing the historic destruction of the NDP and the ascendency of the Greens as the third place party.
Let’s stop the Justin blabbering. It was Harper’s dithering that got us to the point where Trudeau could further screw up the file.You might be right.
It's hard to believe that Canadians could be that stupid - but 4 years ago we proved that we are.
The mess they made with fighter jets is one in a long line of terrible policy ideas they stumbled through.
However, from the polls I assume the next government will be a Liberal minority supported by the Greens and NDP. I wonder if such a government would go ahead with the F35.
It’s the same with the EH-101, With Mulroney’s Conservative government, in office since 1984 doing nothing for three years on the Sea King replacement before announcing in 1987 the purchase of the EH-101, but not a single aircraft was delivered by the time the Liberals took over government five years later in 1993.
Canadian governments take too damn long to procure military kit, so that nothing is irrevocably underway before the government changes.
If the Liberals lose in October we can expect another five years of delays while the Cons work to undo whatever little progress on the fighter project the Liberals have made.
In the mid-1960s Canada chose the Northrop F-5 Freedom Fighter, building the Canadair CF-5. It was considered a bad choice for the CAF, being low tech and low capability.
If Canada were to repeat this for the CF-18 replacement, what's the absolute lowest priced, but diplomatically feasible (so, no HAL Tejas or CAC JF-17) option Canada could choose? It could either be second-hand as F-35s begin global deliveres (such as ex-Belgium F-16s or more F-18As) or cheap new-builds.
I suppose the closest thing to the CF-5 today is the British Aerospace Hawk 200. The low supersonic (VD of Mach 1.2) Hawk 200 is AIM-120 AMRAAM armed, has a longer combat range than the CF-18 and more than capable of dropping bombs on the Third World despots the RCAF seems to be fighting since the Cold War.
But what's your suggested cheapo option for the RCAF?
@lenaitch what about second hand aircraft? We’re operating former RAAF Hornets now and operated former USAF F-101 Voodoos and ex-USN Banshee fighters. Outside of fighters, we’re operating second hand Leopard 2 tanks, submarines, RCN supply ships, and former American Lockheed Martin VH-71 helicopters (US variant of EH-101).
So, what cheap used fighters could the RCAF buy? Are there any low mileage 10-15 year old F-16s, F-18s or even Mirages and Eurofighters?
A single seat KAI T-50 Golden Eagle would be nice. Though we already operate the Hawk trainer, so the Hawk 200 makes sense in the reduced fighter-strike role. The upcoming Boeing T-X looks like a contender....
Of course I want a proper, latest Gen fighter for the RCAF, and the F-35 is the best pick. So above I’m just suggesting what the accountants might want as the lowest possible cost for the CF-18 whilst still keeping to our NORAD commitments.
Not at all. It means they’ll soldier on into the mid-2070’s.On Monday we’re likely to have a coalition Liberal-NDP government. I can’t see the king maker NDP agreeing to buy the F-35. Does this mean the CF-18 and their ex-Australian cousins will soldier on into the mid-2020?
On Monday we’re likely to have a coalition Liberal-NDP government. I can’t see the king maker NDP agreeing to buy the F-35. Does this mean the CF-18 and their ex-Australian cousins will soldier on into the mid-2020?