I have explained this here a few times before. If you talk to Canadian industry, they don't want assembly work. That's low skill, low profit, low wage work that is not sustainable. The line closes up after the contract and the company is gone.
A lot of our defence and aerospace sector is not composed of highly specialized component makers. They make aircraft structural parts, engine parts, avionics, mission systems, etc. Many are leaders in their field. Think of what CAE does with simulators. Or CMC Esterline with cockpit avionics. Or Wescam with EO/IR turrets. What they want is for the big OEMs to include them in their global supplier chains so that their products can be sold for a full production run. It's extremely frustrating to them that so many Canadians (and our politicians) only think of only wrench turning low wage, low profit works. Some want their products to be part of the OEM's fighter program (F-35, Gripen, etc.) . Some want the government to use the fighter contract to get them work on other platforms. For example, Wescam can't do much on a fighter jet. But they'd be quite happy to have Lockheed put one their EO/IR balls on every single V-280 the US Army buys for the Future Vertical Lift program. That one example alone is worth more than the wrench turning gigs from 80 Gripens put together in a hangar somewhere.
They aren't going to be armed domestically. The desire to arm them is for theatres like Libya and Afghanistan where persistent close air support costs >$20-30k per flight hour with fast jets. The drones are much cheaper.