datamouse
Active Member
Correct, although after an election it's all open even if it's less than a year.Not if it's a certain period, I believe 1 year, later. And by the time council resumes after the election, it will have been over 1 year.
Correct, although after an election it's all open even if it's less than a year.Not if it's a certain period, I believe 1 year, later. And by the time council resumes after the election, it will have been over 1 year.
Whoever is mayor, if the city goes for a LRT, yes, you have to negotiate with council to re-open the issue. But if you don't, you:
* Have to re-opent the Master Agreement, negotiate with Metrolinx re: sunk costs, allocation of responsibilities, etc., and sign said agreement
* Complete the new EA and design at Kennedy
* Order new rolling stock
So, go through with all that effort, and wait for a few more years for studies and construction. OR, re-open the issue at council, win the vote, and then get shovels in the ground without all that hassle.
Why are people still so willing to write off the LRT? It still requires so much work compared to just going back to the original plan.
Why are people still so willing to write off the LRT? It still requires so much work compared to just going back to the original plan.
From a landuse planning point of view the main difference between LRT and subway is that LRT tends to spread new development out over a larger area while a subway will concentrate the same number of people in a few high-density locations. With the subway going to the STC I suspect there will be a lot more very tall condo's and office buildings replacing all that asphalt. The mall itself might even be replaced by a more urban "lifestyle" centre that replicated a real urban community. With the subway there is the opportunity to create a whole new city centre. That in-itself might be worth staying with the subway.
Whoever is mayor, if the city goes for a LRT, yes, you have to negotiate with council to re-open the issue. But if you don't, you:
* Have to re-opent the Master Agreement, negotiate with Metrolinx re: sunk costs, allocation of responsibilities, etc., and sign said agreement
* Complete the new EA and design at Kennedy
* Order new rolling stock
So, go through with all that effort, and wait for a few more years for studies and construction. OR, re-open the issue at council, win the vote, and then get shovels in the ground without all that hassle.
Why are people still so willing to write off the LRT? It still requires so much work compared to just going back to the original plan.
+1
It's pretty ridiculous when people, especially Stinz of all people, say that it's a "done deal" and they need to move on.
So, to them, it wasn't a done deal when:
-the EA for the LRT was complete
-the order for the LRT vehicles was made, with significant cancellation penalties
-$85 million in preliminary design work for the LRT was done
-City council made a stunning 2/3rds majority vote to reaffirm the binding master agreement for LRTs with metrolinx and abandon Rob Ford's subway plan
but somehow a 24-20 vote, tacked on to a number of contradicting and ridiculous resolutions about which transit pet-projects individual councellors "recommend" to metrolinx, overrides all that. The subway doesn't even have an EA done yet.
The master agreement was the only legally binding document, and it requires a 2/3rds majority to reopen. Officially, the city is committed to LRT, and the only official statement otherwise was the following approved motion:
•“That City Council support the extension of the Bloor Danforth Subway Line from Kennedy Station to the Scarborough Town Centre and north to Sheppard Avenue.â€
which is functionally meaningless. At no point in the motion did they ask for the LRT project to be cancelled or recast.
To say that this debate is over because the liberals campaigned on subways is pretty misleading, since it was only Mitzie Hunter who campaigned on it. In contrast, future Mayor Chow has the LRT as a direct plank of her platform. I can't see the liberals going against the will of the new city council, especially since they have a signed contract for LRT.
To call anything Murray does as a "plan" is a bit of a stretch. Between the SRT alignment and the London HSR it's pretty clear that he's winging it as he goes along. I agree that at this point it depends on what the province decides to do, though.
What I think is the most likely scenario a couple months from now:
-EA for subway options is completed - finds SRT option technically impossible because of the curve radii. Meanwhile, it up-estimates the cost for the city's preferred alignment by a couple hundred million
-New city council is elected, with Chow as mayor. Faced with a shortfall that the city would have to cover, plus sunk costs, plus an electoral mandate to go back to the LRT proposal, the subway is nixed. Transit levy goes to gravy.
Except the province wants Sheppard East LRT. Keep in mind, the province is in control now. The Liberals have a majority, and they have the massive dedicated fund. Tory won't affect didly squat if Wynne doesn't agree with him. Wynne will probably be receptive to negotiating SmartTrack to fit into the GO RER plan, but she's not going to change course on already approved project. Sheppard East gets LRT, Finch West gets LRT, Scarborough gets subway. Those aren't changing. Wynne is making it very clear that now's the time to build, not flip-flop as Toronto has pointlessly done for decades.
That's untrue. Council made a clear motion to amend the MA to remove the LRT and replace it with a subway as well as to fund it. The MA is currently being negotiated to deal with issues such as sunk costs.+1
It's pretty ridiculous when people, especially Stinz of all people, say that it's a "done deal" and they need to move on.
So, to them, it wasn't a done deal when:
-the EA for the LRT was complete
-the order for the LRT vehicles was made, with significant cancellation penalties
-$85 million in preliminary design work for the LRT was done
-City council made a stunning 2/3rds majority vote to reaffirm the binding master agreement for LRTs with metrolinx and abandon Rob Ford's subway plan
but somehow a 24-20 vote, tacked on to a number of contradicting and ridiculous resolutions about which transit pet-projects individual councellors "recommend" to metrolinx, overrides all that. The subway doesn't even have an EA done yet.
The master agreement was the only legally binding document, and it requires a 2/3rds majority to reopen. Officially, the city is committed to LRT, and the only official statement otherwise was the following approved motion:
•“That City Council support the extension of the Bloor Danforth Subway Line from Kennedy Station to the Scarborough Town Centre and north to Sheppard Avenue.â€
which is functionally meaningless. At no point in the motion did they ask for the LRT project to be cancelled or recast.
To say that this debate is over because the liberals campaigned on subways is pretty misleading, since it was only Mitzie Hunter who campaigned on it. In contrast, future Mayor Chow has the LRT as a direct plank of her platform. I can't see the liberals going against the will of the new city council, especially since they have a signed contract for LRT.
At this point, what I'd like to see most is the SRT just get rolled into the implementation of GO REX. Chances are the Stouffville line will be electrified before the subway is ready to go anyway. If you're looking at similar timelines, I think GO REX is the better, and more cost effective, option.
It also solves the problem of being seen as "reverting" back to the LRT. The support for Tory's SmartTrack in the general public has been pretty positive. The Scarborough GO REX could be marketed the same way, as an express above ground subway. Subway advocates are happy because as far as they're concerned it's a subway. LRT advocates are happy because it would follow the same alignment as the SRT + extension, and would cost about the same.
As an interim solution (while the SRT is shut down), get GO to install an extra track between Kennedy and Agincourt, and run a smaller GO train set between the two, with a temporary station at Ellesmere. It would be accessible with a TTC fare, and would drastically reduce the number of shuttle buses needed while the SRT is shut down. Basically the same type of implementation as the O-Train pilot project, only using existing GO rolling stock.
My guess is that about 70% of the population hates Chow and 30% likes her, so there has to be vote splitting to get Chow elected.