christiesplits
Senior Member
Bailão has to go. She's been negligible and the area isn't even that Portuguese anymore.
If you look at the redrawing of the council wards, her ward gets split into three pieces. She could be vulnerable.
Bailão has to go. She's been negligible and the area isn't even that Portuguese anymore.
Bailão has to go. She's been negligible and the area isn't even that Portuguese anymore.
If you look at the redrawing of the council wards, her ward gets split into three pieces. She could be vulnerable.
If you look at the redrawing of the council wards, her ward gets split into three pieces. She could be vulnerable.
I don't love his shallow leftist rebellion against developments but Perks is a lock. So that leaves Bailão against Palacio.
I can actually see Palacio retiring and endorsing Bailao in a "Lib-NDP" race which may or may not involve Perks.
I can actually see Palacio retiring and endorsing Bailao in a "Lib-NDP" race which may or may not involve Perks.
Not sure. I do know that despite their ideological differences, they are both members of the 'big tent' Liberal Party, and they probably would rather not go against each other.
Like many of us he probably thought that Miller was right FAR more often than he was wrong. (Unlike Tory or, god forbid, Ford.)Gord Perks was such a 'kiss David Miller's ass' guy
I've heard that those in the know expect Palacio and Bailao to indeed wind up running against each other.
I have the utmost respect for Perks despite him being a bit too lefty to me. I know he genuinely cares and wants to do right by this city, I know he has a serious and intrinsic understanding of how this city works and operates, and I know he understands how transit planning works. If he was running in my ward, I would vote for him because he is genuinely one of the best Councilors this city has to offer.