Eug
Senior Member
Hmmm... I thought this decision to send the elephants to that US sanctuary was supported by the zoo. Apparently not.
Zoo keepers fuming over vote sending elephants to sanctuary
The Toronto Zoo’s elephant keepers are up in arms over a late-night city council vote to send the animals to a sanctuary rather than an accredited facility.
“No offence to any city (councillors) that made the decision, but they’re quite honestly not qualified to make a decision on what’s best for these elephants,’’ an angry Vernon Presley, one of seven elephant keepers at the zoo, told the Star last night.
Council voted 31-4 late Tuesday to send the zoo’s three remaining elephants — Toka, Thika and Iringa — to the sprawling Performing Animal Welfare Society (PAWS) sanctuary in San Andreas, Calif., rather than a zoo accredited with the American Association of Zoos and Aquariums (AZA).
The zoo’s board of management voted in the spring to close the elephant exhibit for cost reasons, and the board’s first choice was an AZA facility.
In the meantime, animal rights advocates, led by former Price is Right host Bob Barker, launched an aggressive campaign to have the trio packed off to PAWS. Barker has offered to put up some of his own money toward the $100,000 to $300,000 cost to move them south.
Behind the scenes, zoo officials, staff and animal rights interests have been debating the merits of the sanctuary. Proponents say PAWS and others like it provide warmer climates and huge swaths for elephants to roam. But critics say sanctuaries have lower standards of care and don’t operate transparently.
I'm sure there is some politicking going on with the zookeepers vs. the sanctuaries, but I do have to wonder: Is this yet another example of City Council overstepping its bounds, swayed by vocal activists rather than those trained to assess the situation based on scientific merit?
After reading this I came across these two opposing positions: AZA vs. PAWS
Zoo Vs. Sanctuary: An Ethical Consideration vs. Zoo Vs. Sanctuary: PAWS Response to AZA
Zoo keepers fuming over vote sending elephants to sanctuary
The Toronto Zoo’s elephant keepers are up in arms over a late-night city council vote to send the animals to a sanctuary rather than an accredited facility.
“No offence to any city (councillors) that made the decision, but they’re quite honestly not qualified to make a decision on what’s best for these elephants,’’ an angry Vernon Presley, one of seven elephant keepers at the zoo, told the Star last night.
Council voted 31-4 late Tuesday to send the zoo’s three remaining elephants — Toka, Thika and Iringa — to the sprawling Performing Animal Welfare Society (PAWS) sanctuary in San Andreas, Calif., rather than a zoo accredited with the American Association of Zoos and Aquariums (AZA).
The zoo’s board of management voted in the spring to close the elephant exhibit for cost reasons, and the board’s first choice was an AZA facility.
In the meantime, animal rights advocates, led by former Price is Right host Bob Barker, launched an aggressive campaign to have the trio packed off to PAWS. Barker has offered to put up some of his own money toward the $100,000 to $300,000 cost to move them south.
Behind the scenes, zoo officials, staff and animal rights interests have been debating the merits of the sanctuary. Proponents say PAWS and others like it provide warmer climates and huge swaths for elephants to roam. But critics say sanctuaries have lower standards of care and don’t operate transparently.
I'm sure there is some politicking going on with the zookeepers vs. the sanctuaries, but I do have to wonder: Is this yet another example of City Council overstepping its bounds, swayed by vocal activists rather than those trained to assess the situation based on scientific merit?
After reading this I came across these two opposing positions: AZA vs. PAWS
Zoo Vs. Sanctuary: An Ethical Consideration vs. Zoo Vs. Sanctuary: PAWS Response to AZA