^ I've to to disagree somewhat on "giving LRT a bad name". Let's flip this over for a second, (and admitting that *aspects* of acquisition have and do give LRTs a black eye, unfairly)..how many projects, *from out of them all* actually happen when promised and on budget? They are the rare exception, rather than the rule.
ION, O-Train and others may be late, but they still represent best practice in this part of the world. ION especially, probably because of the vids posted, really impresses me in a number of ways, not least how the vehicles just glide along apparently effortlessly and agile and smooth. Toronto streetcars have also come a long way, but one can really see the difference in the vids with the LRTs. I just hope Crosstown is as impressive, if not more.
It doesn't matter if they represent the best practices in the world. Here in Waterloo, there's a significant base of individuals who absolutely hate the LRT, and their base is only growing larger because of the fact that bombardier and grandlinq can't seem to get their sh!t together.
I'm finding a lot of problems with the iON LRT, particularly along the GEXR Elmira Sub. There should have been provisions to include a bus looping facility at the Northfield stop, speeds along the segregated ROW should not be limited to 40 km/h, especially since it's separated from traffic, the bus terminal at UW hasn't commenced construction and won't serve University Avenue buses (which is a huge disincentive of using the LRT), there are already signs of wheel flat on the LRVs, many of the stations don't have heaters, and there weren't provisions for a McCormick stop along the line. I'm honestly concerned for the LRT's ridership given these issues.
I don't get where people get this. These aren't extraordinary delays for transit projects. Why would people specifically ascribe them to a type of technology?
I doubt it. Ultimately, local demands drive the need for those projects. Delays elsewhere don't change demands or the needs for those projects.
Ottawa is different, yes, but Waterloo's project isn't nearly as complicated as any other light rail project in the country. Half of it was built along underutilized freight ROWs, with the other half street running. It involved no tunnels, no significant bridge/viaduct work, no new ROW construction/expropriation (on street ROW being the exception), or any other problems we tend to see with larger projects like RER or subway extensions.
So for a small LRT line that has cut corners in every possible way to inconvenience the fewest people, cost the least amount of money, and require the least amount of infrastructure, one and a half years is pretty bad. To put it in perspective, the percentage of scheduled construction/testing to actual construction/testing, Waterloo's LRT is currently 37.5% (1.5+ year delay for a 4 year project). Compare this to the TYSSE (which gets a really bad rep for delays), which was 28.5% (2 year delay for a 7 year project). The Waterloo delay wasn't due to technical challenges building the infrastructure, rather, incompetence on bombardier's behalf of building the vehicles. It is an extraordinary delay for a transit project because the delay is not caused by a typical issue.
There arguably wasn't a need for the iON LRT, rather, a strong desire for it. I supported the project for many reasons, but to imply that all projects are based on demand is a little far fetched. I could argue that there is a demand to expand the streetcar network, build the DRL, replace some heavy bus lines with LRT/subway lines, and they will still see criticism and disdain from everywhere for reasons such as costs, distain for the technology, the delays that will ensue, construction inconveniences, and inconveniences for individuals (especially for drivers) when the system is up and running.