News   Nov 04, 2024
 170     2 
News   Nov 04, 2024
 220     0 
News   Nov 04, 2024
 426     0 

VIA Rail

I just assumed the 3 hours vs 2.5 hours is because there is no direct Montreal-Toronto route, but it is routed through Ottawa? Rather than having a straightish line from Montreal to Toronto with a branch up to Ottawa, which would obviously be faster?
The whole point of going through Ottawa is following an unused rail corridor that follows this path. Also political reasons of connecting the Capital and putting as many cities along a continuous corridor as possible.
 
The whole point of going through Ottawa is following an unused rail corridor that follows this path. Also political reasons of connecting the Capital and putting as many cities along a continuous corridor as possible.
No political reasons. Pure commercial and economic logic: Bypassing Ottawa escalates construction costs and reduces revenues. Only politicians could fund such a nonsense…
 
Last edited:
Amtrak.putting down a pile of cash on shunt devices


- Paul
Imagine how fast we could move things along if Ontario and Quebec “funding matched”

IMG_5154.jpeg
 
I just assumed the 3 hours vs 2.5 hours is because there is no direct Montreal-Toronto route, but it is routed through Ottawa? Rather than having a straightish line from Montreal to Toronto with a branch up to Ottawa, which would obviously be faster?

I'm sure a business case will be released, but its not worth saving 30 minutes to avoid the ridership of Ottawa. 3 hours is already faster than any other mode of transportation from Toronto to Montreal. Yes, even planes. People love to lie to themselves, but once you include getting to the airport, security, baggage, boarding, taxing, deplaning, and then getting from Trudeau airport to downtown Montreal, its easily 4 hours. Yes, maybe some of you have miraculously done it in 3.5 hours, but the average even from BB is 4 hours. Plus the headache of all of the changes of transport, dealing with some fat lady throwing out your shampoo, etc. It also wont be much better once the REM is online, the route is quite circuitous, it will just be a nicer ride than a bus.

People arent going to care if the ride is 30 minutes longer for an Ottawa stop when its still faster than flying, and all you have to do is plop your but down in a seat and from Union to Garre Central you dont even have to move a muscle.

Having branch lines will also cause an increase in cost, maintenance, etc. if we decided to have a route to Ottawa and one direct to Montreal. Its not worth saving 30 minutes.

Also, the route is not that out of the way. Its still rather straight because Montreal is north/east of Toronto.

If we draw a straight line from Toronto to Montreal, even the current CN route is not a straight shot. (please note these are VERY rough estimates of where the existing and HSR lines will be, drawn freehand) There exists no route that would be an actual straight shot to Montreal.

1730474793880.png
 
Last edited:
Doing Toronto - Ottawa - Montreal is about 560km.

Doing Toronto - Kingston - Montreal is about 520km.

So stopping at Ottawa only adds about 40km operating distance.

Given that speeds are averaging around 185km/h along the line, "skipping" ottawa would "save" only 12-15 minutes of travel time. Not worth it.

The reason the quoted line is getting 3-hour travel times while earlier versions quoted 2.5 hours is more likely due to the introduction of larger stretches of slower-speed tracks. I doubt they are doing extensive tunnelling into Montreal and Toronto to shave a few minutes of travel time.
 
Last edited:
Doing Toronto - Ottawa - Montreal is about 560km.

Doing Toronto - Kingston - Montreal is about 520km.

So stopping at Ottawa only adds about 40km operating distance.

Given that speeds are averaging around 185km/h along the line, "skipping" ottawa would "save" only 12-15 minutes of travel time. Not worth it.

The reason the quoted line is getting 3-hour travel times while earlier versions quoted 2.5 hours is more likely due to the introduction of larger stretches of slower-speed tracks. I doubt they are doing extensive tunnelling into Montreal and Toronto to shave a few minutes of travel time.
And using the HFR route, skipping Ottawa would save even less distance. Likely no more than 10-20 km.

Maybe it's because the 401 doesn't go through Ottawa, but people tend to think that it's way more out of the way than it is. In reality a line going from Toronto to Ottawa to Montreal is relatively straight.
 
I think it has to do with existing road routes, correct. Driving Toronto-Ottawa-Montreal adds a lot of time today.

Of course, in reality Toronto to Ottawa should probably also have a freeway along Highway 7 as well as the 401 alignment, as it's significantly more direct than current routes, for the same reason HFR is routing that way.
 
And using the HFR route, skipping Ottawa would save even less distance. Likely no more than 10-20 km.

Maybe it's because the 401 doesn't go through Ottawa, but people tend to think that it's way more out of the way than it is. In reality a line going from Toronto to Ottawa to Montreal is relatively straight.
I think it has to do with existing road routes, correct. Driving Toronto-Ottawa-Montreal adds a lot of time today.

Of course, in reality Toronto to Ottawa should probably also have a freeway along Highway 7 as well as the 401 alignment, as it's significantly more direct than current routes, for the same reason HFR is routing that way.
Just to back these two claims up, using Euclidean („as the crow flies“) distances:
Viewed from Montreal to Toronto, going via Kingston adds 6 km (or 1.2%) and going via Ottawa adds 14 km (2.8%). Viewed from Ottawa to Toronto, however, going via Kingston adds 30 km (8.5%), but going via Peterborough only adds a single km (0.3%)…

IMG_7170.jpeg

 
The other thing is the straight line from Toronto to Montreal goes under long stretches of Lake Ontario and the St. Laurent river. In reality you wouldn't do that and would instead divert further north to stay on land and get onto the Island of Montreal with a short crossing. Both of these diversions bring the line even closer to Ottawa.
 
I think it has to do with existing road routes, correct. Driving Toronto-Ottawa-Montreal adds a lot of time today.

Of course, in reality Toronto to Ottawa should probably also have a freeway along Highway 7 as well as the 401 alignment, as it's significantly more direct than current routes, for the same reason HFR is routing that way.
Hwy. 7 has a very wide shoulder for a stretch between Peterborough and Norwood ON, probably intended for just such a freeway twinning, but I wonder if it could be used for HSR instead. It would reduce the amount of farmland you'd have to expropriate because east of Norwood is mostly forest.
 
Last edited:
Amtrak.putting down a pile of cash on shunt devices


- Paul
So neither a new problem nor isolated to Siemens Chargers, it seems.
 

Back
Top