evandyk
Senior Member
I miss the 75 since moving out west. Never a dull moment, and a great place to teach your kid about life and everything it entails.
How about: NO.There are no subway cars left to save except for the T1s
No, pretty sure they have some T1's the can and should save.No subway cars left to save, period.
No, pretty sure they have some T1's the can and should save.
Only if you can build a full T1 train out of the soda cans they will hopefully become in less than 10 years from nowIt's time to donate that to the museum. One piece at a time and we'll be able to gather a full H train for 81-717
I know, but they're still in storage, possibly awaiting refurbishment for a possible future subway extension, and sometimes come out on special occasions, so I guess they intend to keep a few around as a historical fleet.Sadly the H6's in Turkey were retired
Maybe it's all the 30+ year old international students but I notice Miway busses are pretty full so it's not all the burbs, it's also the only place someone tried to sell me their paper transfer (for $1) after they got off the bus LOLIt's a form of broken window theory - no visible sign of rule enforcement signal to would-be-violators that misbehaviour is perfectly acceptable.
It's the burbs afterall - though the then inner city issues are starting to percolate to the 905.
AoD
Your opinion is noted, and not universally shared with the historical community.Why? There's nothing special about them
I could say the same.Your opinion is noted, and not universally shared with the historical community.
Dan

Doesn't necessarily make it more worth saving than a Hawker either. Are you and others here related to the T1s and/or would be equally upset if they don't get saved as I am about the H5s? If the historical community and/or the TTC/HCRR won't save a Hawker for whatever reason they give (not enough space/resources, etc), what business have they saving any other subway car instead? The same reasons for not saving a Hawker should apply to any other subway car as well, otherwise they are as hypocritical as can be. I am entitled to contend that the T1s (and especially TRs) are not worth saving for several reasons, as much as the rest of the historical community is entitled to do the same about the Hawkers.Congratulations for digging up something I wrote 16 years ago, but you've missed the point.
The point is not what my or the historical community's opinion is of a specific piece of rolling stock. The problem is with your contention that a particular piece isn't worth preserving simply because of whatever arbitrary reasons you have decided to come up with. Should everything be saved? In an ideal world, yes. Just because you don't like it doesn't make it any less worth saving.
Dan
What do expect using 2018 budget in 2024 for service hours and drivers. Sept will see a bump in service if drivers are found with the city adding another 4% increase on top of the plan 4% for this year.Maybe it's all the 30+ year old international students but I notice Miway busses are pretty full so it's not all the burbs, it's also the only place someone tried to sell me their paper transfer (for $1) after they got off the bus LOL
Also apparently Zuuuuuum is at 130% of pre covid ridership.
Congratulations for digging up something I wrote 16 years ago, but you've missed the point.
I didn't say that.Doesn't necessarily make it more worth saving than a Hawker either.
Are you really that daft?Are you and others here related to the T1s and/or would be equally upset if they don't get saved as I am about the H5s?
This is where the historical community has a problem. There are finite resources with which they can expend to save and store equipment.If the historical community and/or the TTC/HCRR won't save a Hawker for whatever reason they give (not enough space/resources, etc), what business have they saving any other subway car instead?
Except that you are contending that the historical community doesn't want to save the Hawkers. That's simply not true, and never has been.The same reasons for not saving a Hawker should apply to any other subway car as well, otherwise they are as hypocritical as can be. I am entitled to contend that the T1s (and especially TRs) are not worth saving for several reasons, as much as the rest of the historical community is entitled to do the same about the Hawkers.
I'm merely repeating the same sarcastic question someone else asked me a few pages back.Are you really that daft?
And it sure seems like the Hawkers are consistently the only subway equipment to not be picked.Another school of thought is to be pickier with what is and isn't saved, and focus on what is deemed "important" and put as many resources as possible into it.
Well, I can't count the number of times over the years whenever anyone brought up the idea of saving them, it would be met with dismissive comments that they're not worthy of it, or how the existing 2 saved cars are "good enough". In any case, if there's an inability to save a Hawker I'm calling shenanigans on the ability to save another subway, and vice versa.Except that you are contending that the historical community doesn't want to save the Hawkers. That's simply not true, and never has been.
You seem to be conflating the inability to do something with a hatred of it. It's a false equivalency.
Gee, I wonder if that may have something to do with the fact that the Hawkers are the only generation of subway cars to have been retired since 1999???????? Seriously, at what point in those years did you expect the opportunity to say no to Gloucesters or T1s?And it sure seems like the Hawkers are consistently the only subway equipment to not be picked.




