News   Apr 16, 2024
 560     3 
News   Apr 16, 2024
 439     1 
News   Apr 16, 2024
 795     0 

TTC: Other Items (catch all)

Here is the latest schedule, as you can see the actual track work is a fairly small part of this project. They hope to finish 99% of Wellington work by mid-August.
Wellingtom schedule.jpg
 
Ottawa always had the demand. Being the second largest transit agency in Ontario and a "subway" to replace the badly congested BRT, it's hardly a surprise. Is the demand is existing or growth?

As for Line 5, there's some ridership building needed. It definitely won't over take the Confederation Line anytime soon. Routes 32, 34/54(on Eg) doesn't even contribute to 100,000 daily riders. In fact Line 5 and 6 added on to the streetcar ridership will lower this number since mileage went up. When Ottawa opens their extensions, there number will drop as the suburban extensions won't get nearly the same ridership as their current core line.
People for some ungodly reason seem to forget that the crosstown will have more than 50 bus connections, connections to 3 (+1 in the future) subway lines, and 3 GO lines. The 34 and 32 aren't the entire story. They never have been and never will be.
 
As for Line 5, there's some ridership building needed. It definitely won't over take the Confederation Line anytime soon.
Not straight away. Projected ridership is about 150,000 trips a day for 2031. Length is about 20 km. So about 7,500 riders per kilometre. So lower than Line 4. And even Line 3 when it was at it's peak.
 
People for some ungodly reason seem to forget that the crosstown will have more than 50 bus connections, connections to 3 (+1 in the future) subway lines, and 3 GO lines. The 34 and 32 aren't the entire story. They never have been and never will be.
I remember but I mean the immediate demand. The point I'm making is comparing directly with Ottawa. The ridership that is going to be there on day one. The crosstown isn't the only option in Toronto so the ridership it generates from connections are lower than Ottawa.
 
Ottawa always had the demand. Being the second largest transit agency in Ontario and a "subway" to replace the badly congested BRT, it's hardly a surprise. Is the demand is existing or growth?

As for Line 5, there's some ridership building needed. It definitely won't over take the Confederation Line anytime soon. Routes 32, 34/54(on Eg) doesn't even contribute to 100,000 daily riders. In fact Line 5 and 6 added on to the streetcar ridership will lower this number since mileage went up. When Ottawa opens their extensions, there number will drop as the suburban extensions won't get nearly the same ridership as their current core line.

Also rail attracts more riders, especially in a city with a transit culture like Toronto's. Plus Line 5 will speed up a lot of trips, just mainly in the west . . .
 
In our latest video we talk about Toronto's "lost" subway station Bay Lower, and what may have happened had it been better designed!


Better designed or not, it was a flawed concept from the start. If anything they should have made the Sheppard Line a branch of Line 1.
 
With that high ridership, the O-train could have been a conventional metro.

I see Ottawa-Gatineau being large enough to justify having a conventional metro.

The only real mistake was building the Confederation Line as a low-floor LRT, which has limited flow and capacity compared with high-floor vehicles. In every other aspect - 100% grade separation, modern signaling, fare pre-payment, frequent service, train lengths, it operates like a light metro. Not even Calgary -- the North American leader in LRT implementation -- can boast complete grade separation.
 
The only real mistake was building the Confederation Line as a low-floor LRT, which has limited flow and capacity compared with high-floor vehicles. In every other aspect - 100% grade separation, modern signaling, fare pre-payment, frequent service, train lengths, it operates like a light metro. Not even Calgary -- the North American leader in LRT implementation -- can boast complete grade separation.
Calgary has their own share of problems. Trains dwell too long in the downtown strip in rush hour. In a snowstorm, their service would be messed up. Instead of being Red Line train, Blue Line train, Red Line train, it'll be Red, Red, Red, Blue, Red train. They still don't have a fare card either.

The Confederation Line is built as a LRT so they could potentially extend it onto the streets. They don't want that option removed. As for the current line itself, it's a major mistake. Probably cause it replaced the older on street light rail project through the core. That would be a major mistake but they were stupid enough to pass that and ended up paying Siemens for ripping up the contract. They are probably mad that Alstom got to show off their trains instead of them.
 
Calgary has their own share of problems. Trains dwell too long in the downtown strip in rush hour. In a snowstorm, their service would be messed up. Instead of being Red Line train, Blue Line train, Red Line train, it'll be Red, Red, Red, Blue, Red train. They still don't have a fare card either.

The Confederation Line is built as a LRT so they could potentially extend it onto the streets. They don't want that option removed. As for the current line itself, it's a major mistake. Probably cause it replaced the older on street light rail project through the core. That would be a major mistake but they were stupid enough to pass that and ended up paying Siemens for ripping up the contract. They are probably mad that Alstom got to show off their trains instead of them.
Unless there's a major change in leadership, the Confederation Line is unlikely to ever run on the streets. The current plans for Phase 3 (which extend the lines to the outermost suburbs) are still planned to be fully grade separated thankfully.
 
Calgary has their own share of problems. Trains dwell too long in the downtown strip in rush hour. In a snowstorm, their service would be messed up. Instead of being Red Line train, Blue Line train, Red Line train, it'll be Red, Red, Red, Blue, Red train. They still don't have a fare card either.

The Confederation Line is built as a LRT so they could potentially extend it onto the streets. They don't want that option removed. As for the current line itself, it's a major mistake. Probably cause it replaced the older on street light rail project through the core. That would be a major mistake but they were stupid enough to pass that and ended up paying Siemens for ripping up the contract. They are probably mad that Alstom got to show off their trains instead of them.

Unless there's a major change in leadership, the Confederation Line is unlikely to ever run on the streets. The current plans for Phase 3 (which extend the lines to the outermost suburbs) are still planned to be fully grade separated thankfully.

The 2013 Via Train/OCTranspo Bus collision basically ended any chance of the Confederation Line running along the streets, but since the contract for the Confederation Line was awarded in 2012, it was too late to change it from being an LRT. Which is how it ended up as the weird "LRT trains running as a fully separated light metro" that it is now (and will continue to be).
 

Opinion: How Elected Officials Can Improve Public Transit: It Starts with Actually Riding the Bus

From link.

One of the many things President Biden was known for during his decades-long run as a U.S. senator was his daily train rides to and from Washington, D.C. Dubbed “Amtrak Joe” by his colleagues, Biden was simply looking to balance his career in D.C. with his family life in Delaware. However, he might have been onto something with these regular public transit trips — giving him a real-world view of how this critical community infrastructure operates.

The public transportation ecosystem consists of complex parts, each with their own unique and region-specific challenges. While local officials debate the best ways to improve their respective transit systems, the truth is that most of them lack a real-world perception of their own local transit systems. This is because most haven’t had to actually catch the bus or train in years, or even decades (unless for a photo opportunity).

The first step to driving long-overdue change to America’s transportation system is getting in on the ground level to understand community needs and common frustrations. In fact, I’d argue it should become law that public officials, especially those serving dense metropolitan areas, must regularly take different modes of public transit.

Take for example, in New York City. The current mayoral race includes a list of high-profile candidates spanning the sphere of politics, and New Yorkers are forced to determine who they can count on to make real changes to improve their city. Transit is an essential slice of the Big Apple pie. However, this requires going beyond having iconic New Yorkers such as Jerry Seinfeld voice safety messages throughout trains and on platforms. It requires exposing and solving real pain points in the daily NYC transportation experience.

For NYC mayoral candidates and elected officials across the U.S., regularly experiencing the realities of transit riders will enable them to understand the intricacies of transportation systems, build empathy, and emphasize their commitment to improving residents’ lives.


Get a better grasp on the complexities of public transportation systems

From navigating ever-changing schedules and maps to purchasing fares and passes, there’s no denying that public transit is complex. For public officials, taking the time to understand the ins and outs of their local transit system not only enables them to gain fundamental operational knowledge, but it also helps them identify critical areas for improvement — and, if possible, more funding.


Build empathy for local riders that depend on public transit for daily needs

For politicians, driving in a car (or having a driver) is the default transportation experience. However, the number one goal for elected officials is to serve and support the local community. How can politicians effectively do this without being empathetic to the daily experiences, and sometimes struggles, their residents face?

Empathy is a major reason that elected officials should commit to regularly riding public transit. This doesn’t mean scheduled rides where transit operators roll out the red carpet for the mayor and their team. To get the true commuter experience, elected officials must wait in the cold for 15 minutes, only for a fully packed train to arrive and immediately depart the platform. By gaining these real-world experiences, elected officials can make better public funding decisions that support their unique community needs.


Reiterate the importance of public transit and commitment to improving it

Public transportation is a fundamental lifeline for many. It serves a critical link in the chain to economic success, enabling residents to get to work, school, the grocery store and important healthcare appointments. In addition, it’s one of the most public-facing community services that residents directly fund. Therefore, they want to be sure elected officials are putting their dollars to good use.

The very act of elected officials taking public transit signals to the local community that they recognize the importance of these systems and that it is a top priority. It also shows that they are taking the time to understand areas for improvement so they can make the best use of public funds.

From the NYC politicians currently running for mayor, to senators such as Joe Biden that held office for decades, my advice is to truly get embedded in the community. Take the time to understand basic needs and make sure every decision is made with empathy at its core. There’s no better way to start than by taking the bus.
 
This is from June 14, 2012 for the H5 final run and something not seen or heard today.
9086484421_2b3564c657_b.jpg
 
The TTC is finally starting to use those new LCD screens implemented on the newer bus fleet. I believe they are pilots for now with design improvements coming later.

1615217910499.png

Link:
Not all that great IMO. They can certainly add in more features than just the next stops. Good to see they have an estimated time section but it was not in use according to the photo. The background color should be changed and it would also be nice to see service alerts added in. And if it's not too much to ask, show other bus routes that people can transfer to.

This fantasy design example is much better in my opinion.

1615217810858.png


1615217835686.png


1615217869347.png


Link:
 

Back
Top