News   Aug 09, 2024
 984     2 
News   Aug 09, 2024
 760     0 
News   Aug 09, 2024
 3.4K     2 

TTC: Other Items (catch all)

Let's get a few things straight, starting with this:
I was at a meeting of cyclists last night when the topic of cycling in the winter came up. One person made a reference I have heard before: that in Scandinavian cities with a similar winter temperature and snowfall to Toronto, 30% of people commute by bicycle.

The reference is to Copenhagen, Denmark, whose successful cycling-friendly policies have become well-known thanks to the film Contested Streets. According to the movie, something like 30% of commuter trips in the city are by bicycle (by 2006, the number was 36%). But is its winter climate really comparable to Toronto’s? I decided to check.

Here are Toronto’s average high and low temperatures during winter months (in degrees Celsius) according to the BBC Weather Centre:

December: Min -6 Max +1
January: Min -9 Max -1
February: Min -9 Max -1
March: Min -5 Max -1

Here are Copenhagen’s average high and low temperatures during the same months:

December: Min +1 Max +4
January: Min -2 Max +2
February: Min -3 Max +2
March: Min -1 Max +5

The difference is pretty significant – the average maximum in Copenhagen does not drop below freezing, and the variations are much more moderate — it does not get nearly as cold (bearing in mind that people commute in the morning and late afternoon, when the temperature is not at its maximum). While Copenhagen is hardly temperate, its winter cannot be considered as severe as Toronto’s.

As for snowfall, Toronto’s average yearly snowfall is around 144 cm (55.5 in). I found it hard to track down the equivalent statistic for Copenhagen, possibly because snowfall seems to be rare and not heavy. In fact, a Copenhagen blog about biking in the rain doesn’t even consider the possibility of snow. Information about Denmark as a whole describes snowfalls as occasional but shortlived, with little accumulation. Once again, Copenhagen’s situation is not really comparable to Toronto’s, where snowfall is erratic but at times significant.

Not only is Copenhagen’s winter weather fairly different from Toronto’s, but it is different in significant ways: there is far less freezing, with the consequent dangers of ice, not to mention physical discomfort, and there is rarely significant snow on the road.

Copenhagen is a great model for how to create a bike-friendly city, but it is not all that relevant for the issue of biking in Toronto winters.

Other, more northerly Scandinavian cities may have winters more similar to Toronto, but I do not believe that they have a comparable volume of cyclists to Copenhagen.
http://spacing.ca/toronto/2007/09/28/winter-cycling-in-toronto-vs-copenhagen/

Not only that, bicycle lanes (of which there are many) in Copenhagen are cleared of snow before the roads. The bikes are entirely different, they are riding staid uprights, the clown in the Toronto picture had 19c tires on, drop bars, external gears, and lots of alloy (which trust me, corrodes in salt and grit). He's also got no clearance if he hits an icy patch, let alone that he looks frozen and overburdened with clothing. What's the point?

Not only that, even in Copenhagen, the number of cyclists goes down significantly in the winter. Why do you think that might be?

Of course you can cycle in the snow, the comparator often dragged out is the town in northern Norway where they put on the massive winter tires and cycle all winter. It takes an over-sized frame clearance to use those tires, so they have the specially built grossly built bulldozer type bikes to do it. Well bully for them! I like to dance, not wear snow-shoes or moon boots.

I'll walk or take the transit, be damned if I'm going to freeze may arse off, damage myself and my machine purely to make some kind of point.

I even avoid cycling in the rain, it's dangerous and no fun, and even rain gets into bearings, brake lines, defeats braking effort and ruins a quality leather saddle, even with a rain cover on it. Not to mention lack of visibility and loss of adhesion.

Some people live in single room shacks. And don't wear winter clothing, eat fermented Herring for dinner and grow beards. Bully for them!

And btw: Copenhagen has over 1000 km of bicycle lanes. Toronto?
 
Last edited:
The TTC is, unfortunately, for most, myself included, the Better Way come winter, along with distance walking:
Overcomplicating Winter Cycling - Why It's Bad


One of the main focuses of this blog has always been on how Copenhagen and other cities have succeeded in increasing cycling levels by approaching the subject using mainstream marketing techniques. Tried and tested marketing that has existed since homo sapiens first started selling or trading stuff to each other.

Modern bicycle advocacy, by and large, is flawed. It is firmly inspired by environmentalism which, in turn, is the greatest marketing flop in the history of humankind. Four decades of sub-cultural finger-wagging, guilt trips and preaching have given few results among the general population.

When sub-cultural groups start trying to indoctrinate and convert the public, it rarely ever succeeds. For the better part of a century, people all over the planet rode bicycles because they were quick, easy, convenient and enjoyable. In hilly cities. In hot cities. In snowy cities.

After the bicycle largely disappeared from the urban landscape because urban planning started revolving around the car and the automobile industry began their dreadfully effective marketing after the Second World War, many regions in the world have been left suffering in a bicycle vacuum.

The result is that an entire generation has been given the impression that cycling is something that a few people do for sport or recreation and not much else. People who take their hobby seriously and who invest in all manner of clothes and gear.

Regular citizens are hardly inspired to join such groups.

Now we are in the midst of a veritable bicycle boom all over the world. It's exciting. It's challenging. We were excited by the cycling revival in the 1970's but, as we all know, that faded to black again. It is of utmost importance that we maintain our current momentum and (re)secure the bicycle's place in our cities.

This will only be achieved if we focus on marketing urban cycling as a normal activity for regular citizens. If we concentrate on the masses who could be cycling, would like to be cycling, might take up urban cycling. When sub-cultures are the most vocal advocates we see that most of the advocacy stems from their own passion for their hobby/lifestyle. It seems that the goal is to get more people to join their ranks and become 'one of them', as opposed to selling urban cycling as it was meant to be from the beginning of Bicycle Culture 1.0 in the late 19th century - individual mobility for Citizen Cyclists.

So. It's that time of year again. All manner of 'how to cycle in the winter' guides are slapped up all over the internet. Year after year the sub-cultures put on their professor hats and look down their nose at the general population while they attempt to 'teach' people how to be just like them. You know... real cyclists.

I have stumbled upon a blogpost with an infographic like this one and a couple of months ago this article featured in a magazine that used to be focused on Citizen Cyclists but that has gone all sub-cultural. (they even name brand names in their 'guide', reflecting the fact that they are dependent on sponsors and advertising and not subscriptions)

While I blogged about this strange phenomenon way back in 2008 after blogging about yet another sub-cultural winter clothing guide on this website, I got curious.

Let's assume a regular citizen wanted to ride a bike in the winter. What if they stumbled upon one of the links with the infographic or guide I just mentioned?

What would this citizen - who, like the majority of the population, doesn't want to be a member of a club or sub-culture - think about what they read?

Dressing in layers? Sure. But you know what? People who live in winter climates know that already, for god's sake. They do it when they walk around the city, taking the bus or train or whatever. So they can probably figure it out when on a bicycle. And, after one day doing so, if they discover they got cold, they'll put extra clothes on the next day.

I own no cycling 'gear' whatsoever. I have, however, a winter wardrobe as I live in a country with a winter climate and I ski, etc.

What would it cost me - Joe Bicycle User - if I followed the 'advice' on these websites? Using the infographic on that website as a guide, I did some quick googling to find out some prices. I didn't spend an enormous amount of time on it, I must admit. So some of the items may be cheaper - or they might be more expensive because I didn't discover 'the coolest brands'.


As you can see, if I don't calculate my bike, I would be easily €870 ($1100) out of pocket in order to be 'just like them'. Sure, maybe there are many people who wish to take their hobby seriously and acquire all that gear, but let's face it. Most people don't. They're just pondering riding their bike in the winter because they've gotten hooked riding it all year.

But it's this kind of sub-cultural crap that the curious, potential winter bicycle users end up with after a google search. Google "winter cycling clothes" yourself and see what comes up. The results are dominated by 'cyclists' keen on recruiting, with little advice aimed at regular citizens. Not a good sign if we are trying to get people to rediscover the simplicity and convenience of urban cycling that people have enjoyed for over a century. [...continues...]
http://www.copenhagenize.com/2012/01/overcomplicating-winter-cycling-why-its.html
 
I am avid rider, do serious long-distance too, and wouldn't ride most days in the winter. It's hell on a machine, let alone yourself. I've argued this with a number of die-hards, who insist that salt and grit doesn't take a toll on a good machine, but I've been building, riding and repairing bikes for generations, and have seen what it does. Plus it's incredibly dangerous when it's icy and slippery, let alone when the curb is buried and there's no shoulder.
I use Bike Share Toronto exclusively in the winter, so I don't have to worry about salt and grit ruining my bike. That alone is worth the $90/year membership fee.
 
I use Bike Share Toronto exclusively in the winter, so I don't have to worry about salt and grit ruining my bike. That alone is worth the $90/year membership fee.
If you're addicted, then you're right, best do it with a machine that's not your liability. Some of the Copenhageners interviewed in vids I watched all had two bikes. A very good one, and one for the slush. In my case, rather than ride a lesser bike, unless I'm really in a bind, I'll walk or take transit. One becomes so in tune with a quality machine that body english and sense of clearance become second nature. On an alternate machine, that ingrained sense can get you into trouble, especially on slippery pavement. Forty two pounds of unbalanced non-responsive concrete block is not my idea of civilized cycling. Like many others, I pick my weather to cycle in. (And just got in from well over 100 kms this afternoon on rail-trail mostly)

Btw: I cycled all winter living in London, even took my bike by train on the travelcard to the edge of the coverage, and cycled in countryside. But London's weather is conducive to that, and Copenhagen not much different.

Toronto's is very different...
 
Last edited:
If you're addicted, then you're right, best do it with a machine that's not your liability. Some of the Copenhageners interviewed in vids I watched all had two bikes. A very good one, and one for the slush. In my case, rather than ride a lesser bike, unless I'm really in a bind, I'll walk or take transit. One becomes so in tune with a quality machine that body english and sense of clearance become second nature. On an alternate machine, that ingrained sense can get you into trouble, especially on slippery pavement. Forty two pounds of unbalanced non-responsive concrete block is not my idea of civilized cycling. Like many others, I pick my weather to cycle in. (And just got in from well over 100 kms this afternoon on rail-trail mostly)
I use bike share and my own bike in about equal amounts, so I don't really have this problem. I use bike share all year because it's also convenient for one way trips, getting to work, and being able to pick up a bike and quickly get somewhere unplanned when you're on foot.
 
How can you tell which one is the 192?

Far right halfway down the image. To the right of the TTC novabus non-artic, underneath the PCC, above the TR. That's the airport rocket. The buses have been wrapped specially for the route:

b988-20141212-ttc-airport.jpg-resize_then_crop-_frame_bg_color_FFF-h_1365-gravity_center-q_70-preserve_ratio_true-w_2048_.jpg
 
How can you tell which one is the 192?
It might be the colour scheme as well as the limited model type assigned to the route:
[...]
In an effort to better promote the 192 Airport Rocket, the twelve dedicated buses received a special exterior wrap. It consists of an off white base with assorted passport stamps and the slogan "your journey starts here". The upper five-sixths of the front has been painted black.
[...]
https://cptdb.ca/wiki/index.php/Toronto_Transit_Commission_route_192_'Airport_Rocket'
https://cptdb.ca/wiki/index.php/Toronto_Transit_Commission_8000-8099
 
How can you tell which one is the 192?

Far right halfway down the image. To the right of the TTC novabus non-artic, underneath the PCC, above the TR. That's the airport rocket. The buses have been wrapped specially for the route:

b988-20141212-ttc-airport.jpg-resize_then_crop-_frame_bg_color_FFF-h_1365-gravity_center-q_70-preserve_ratio_true-w_2048_.jpg
Although it's not uncommon to see these buses appear on other routes so it would still be best for one who's unfamiliar with the TTC to look at the destination sign. Better yet, look to see if there are any passengers with luggages before boarding.
 
Although it's not uncommon to see these buses appear on other routes so it would still be best for one who's unfamiliar with the TTC to look at the destination sign. Better yet, look to see if there are any passengers with luggages before boarding.

Or just ask yourself "Am I at Kipling Station? Am I at the airport?" - if you aren't, it's not the 192 bus.
 
Well shooting photos at Wilson south lot on Sunday, was amused watching the subway trains running empty at various speed in both direction, as well seeing empty shuttle buses heading north. Only a few buses had riders that were small in number and only one bus with a haft a load. This was at 12:30.

I also found myself using the east loop area for the 29 at Wilson and the first time using it.

As my train was heading into St Clair Station from the north, it came to a halt. A few minutes later someone on the train announced that central dispatch had told all trains to stop where they were and wait instruction. My first thought it was a system failure, but learn wrong when I got home. After getting off at St Clair I headed west for a photo Shot. When I went to catch the 512 east, a large number on the platform which meant a nice gap on line. 5 minutes later 4 cars came into sight and knew the first few cars would be pack. No one could get on the first with a lot trying on the 2nd and 3rd. I waited for the 4th, as I knew there would next to no rider and sure enough there was less than a haft a car. When got to the southbound platform, it was pack which meant the line was still dealing with the problem that was there when I got off an hour before. Stop for lunch at Bloor and noticed shuttle buses running south on Yonge and don't remember if there was supposed to be any for the Spadina closure. Found out why when I got home. The Yonge line was still a mess when I went to get a southbound.

Heading north on 510, we had to wait a few lights at Front as well King because cars were blocking the line heading home from the baseball game. Both intersection are bad daily and something needs to be done to fix the problem.
 
Any advice on the best TTC app? All I want to do is find out when my bus is going to arrive.
 

Back
Top