Steve X
Senior Member
And none on the 504. No surprises, they got enough ALRVs to make up for that4412, 4415, 4416, 4426 are running on the 511 Bathurst today.
And none on the 504. No surprises, they got enough ALRVs to make up for that4412, 4415, 4416, 4426 are running on the 511 Bathurst today.
Time to terrorize the drivers on Bathurst. And test that nightmare intersection at Bathurst and Lakeshore in service.4412, 4415, 4416, 4426 are running on the 511 Bathurst today.
Didn't Fs run on 511 during Pan AmsTime to terrorize the drivers on Bathurst. And test that nightmare intersection at Bathurst and Lakeshore in service.
Didn't Fs run on 511 during Pan Ams
I was surprised no one ran the open doors when I rode them back then. It was the first time they had them on a mix traffic environment.Yes; they seemed to do fine.
It will be interesting to see TTC testing 2 cars this week once 4436 arrives. Its been 16 days since 4435 arrived and still hasn't reach its 600 km burn in yet and looks like it had some issues to go back to zero.
Looking at the overhead this past week, looks like 2018 will be the completion time frame and a reason all the cars are to have poles on them, not the plan 60. The plan schedule was the end of 2016 and this could be because of lack of funds to do the work.
Queen St overhead has been removed west of Victoria St and assuming to York St to allow the removal of the 2 bridges over the line. Wellington has also lost its overhead as well and for got to check to see if all of Richmond has the new overhead to replace the one that was removed for the rebuilding of the road.
Watch 3 505 loose their poles while turning onto Dundas off Church on Tuesday for the new overhead and have seen this at a few other location as well this past week.
I an off for the next week, as I am heading to Detroit for the Friday opening of their QLine and ride it and do some traveling. Want to see how the batteries handle the 60% off line as it will be the longest length I have been on for a battery car. 100% batteries cars are the future.
I doubt we would see the TTC go to battery operation with the streetcars until it's actually proven in service somewhere. They are currently getting rid of the hybrid buses because of problems with getting in early with them. Probably by the time they will be looking at new Streetcars again is when they would consider something like that as 30 years is the average lifespan for transit vechles in daily service.Curious what the options are for retrofitting batteries onto the flexities? We will likely have them for another 30-40 years, so there is probably a good chance that in that time a retrofit might happen....could they go on the ceiling or under the floor? If there were sections of Toronto that could go wireless where to start? Tunnels? Barns? Where are the problem points? Would it make expansion easier (i.e. getting under the railway at Cherry? The lift bridge?)
Probably seeing the flashing stop sign on the back helps plus people generally pull forward if they are between doors if they can.I was surprised no one ran the open doors when I rode them back then. It was the first time they had them on a mix traffic environment.
Absolutely zero. A hippopotamus is a hippopotamus. A zebra is a zebra. And a LRT vehicle designed to run from overhead is just that. The fleet would be scrapped and replaced before it got retrofitted. Ask a builder which job is easier. Renovating a home or building new. Nine times out of ten it's easier to build new.Curious what the options are for retrofitting batteries onto the flexities? We will likely have them for another 30-40 years, so there is probably a good chance that in that time a retrofit might happen....could they go on the ceiling or under the floor? If there were sections of Toronto that could go wireless where to start? Tunnels? Barns? Where are the problem points? Would it make expansion easier (i.e. getting under the railway at Cherry? The lift bridge?)
Exactly. Plus, TTC built the entire overhead system and would continue to maintain/upgrade their equipment. Why would they scrap them just for some overpriced batteries? It will take decades for batteries to be much cheaper to maintain and would be more efficient and reliable than the current overhead system. Plus the LRVs would be more expensive.Absolutely zero. A hippopotamus is a hippopotamus. A zebra is a zebra. And a LRT vehicle designed to run from overhead is just that. The fleet would be scrapped and replaced before it got retrofitted. Ask a builder which job is easier. Renovating a home or building new. Nine times out of ten it's easier to build new.
Curious what the options are for retrofitting batteries onto the flexities? We will likely have them for another 30-40 years, so there is probably a good chance that in that time a retrofit might happen....could they go on the ceiling or under the floor? If there were sections of Toronto that could go wireless where to start? Tunnels? Barns? Where are the problem points? Would it make expansion easier (i.e. getting under the railway at Cherry? The lift bridge?)
It will cost big buck to put batteries into the new cars, as well ridership space and wouldn't recommend it.Curious what the options are for retrofitting batteries onto the flexities? We will likely have them for another 30-40 years, so there is probably a good chance that in that time a retrofit might happen....could they go on the ceiling or under the floor? If there were sections of Toronto that could go wireless where to start? Tunnels? Barns? Where are the problem points? Would it make expansion easier (i.e. getting under the railway at Cherry? The lift bridge?)
It will cost big buck to put batteries into the new cars, as well ridership space and wouldn't recommend it.
After riding Detroit as well walking a large section of Detroit QLine, The Brockville cars aren't ready for prime time on a 60% off line The Brockville cars are for small system requiring 10 or less cars per order. They only seat 34 people on a 66' 3 section with a low floor centre section taking up about 60% of the car. The section has 4 flip down seats for riders if a bike is not hanging there with 4 spots for wheelchair/strollers. Trying to get the 2 sq ft per rider space to get the 125 riders per car and not going to make it on Friday ridership. Hate to think what Sat and Sunday would for riders not being able to get on any of the 5 cars on line. Crush loads all day with cars passing platforms with riders on them. Riders were forced off the cars at each end to get into a line to catch the car going the other way.
I going to have look into the 2 systems to get more info how one is going to convert their existing fleet from pan to battery; the cost to do it; cost saving not having overhead crews and a few other things. The other is doing a new fleet to replace the existing ones.
If you are going to go with 100% battery, you do a line by line replacement as well the removal of the overhead outside joint intersections.
At this point as a pusher for battery, time to step back and wait another 10-20 years before doing anything.