News   Sep 18, 2019
 175     0 
News   Sep 18, 2019
 628     1 
News   Sep 18, 2019
 406     1 

Transit Fantasy Maps

Rainforest

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Mar 23, 2008
Messages
3,872
Reaction score
1,186
IMO, a continuous Lawrence Crosstown route is only possible if a sizeable underground section (and its cost) is accepted. Both the Bridle Path area and the narrow section from Bayview to Bathurst would be blockers otherwise.

It might be best to start with the eastern section first, Rouge Hill to Don Mills / DRL interchange. Once it is in place, deal with the challenging central section.
 

north-of-anything

New Member
Member Bio
Joined
Dec 21, 2018
Messages
99
Reaction score
88
Location
Bradford
If the route has to be divided halfway through, I think it might make sense for the eastern stretch to be continuous from Leslie Street (Toronto Botanical Gardens) to Rouge Hill. If the western stretch ends at Bayview, then I would also have it keep going southbound to at least Eglinton. This could draw more people to/from Sunnybrook Hospital via the Eglinton Crosstown. (If it's an LRT it miiight be able to contninue down Bayview, then swing west after the Davisville cemetery to join up with the 512, though that's probably a stretch.)
 

Hopkins123

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Jul 16, 2013
Messages
1,500
Reaction score
971
There better be a branch of the 124 Sunnybrook that serves CNIB, Holland Bloorview, and Toronto Rehab if the Lawrence LRT were to be constructed.
You just as well could extend the 124 south to serve the soon-to-be-completed Leaside LRT station at Bayview and Eglinton and still serve all those nodes.
 

north-of-anything

New Member
Member Bio
Joined
Dec 21, 2018
Messages
99
Reaction score
88
Location
Bradford
In the same vein as the Lawrence proposal, here's one that would be even more likely to be continuous:

Steeles BRT (aka Viva Red if we ever get some kind of fare integration between YRT and TTC)

West End
Highway 407 Terminal (connections with Line 1, YRT, GO)
Pioneer Village (connections with Line 1, YRT)
Keele Street
Alness Street/Viceroy Road
Dufferin Street
New Westminster Drive
Bathurst Street

This area is mostly low-density commercial and industrial properties. Between Alness/Viceroy and Dufferin, especially, is a medium stretch of strip malls and industrial buildings. Perhaps a few of the buildings next to Steeles Avenue could be redeveloped into mid-rises with commercial frontage, to provide a smoother transition into the apartment buildings next to the Don River West.

Thornhill
Bathurst Street
Cactus Avenue/Palm Gate Boulevard
Hilda Avenue
Yonge Street (connection with Line 1)
Henderson Avenue/Maxome Avenue (positioned to the west of the intersection)
Bayview Avenue (existing bus loop preserved for Bayview service)
Laureleaf Road
Leslie Street
Don Mills Road

This area has a large amount of established neighbourhoods and parklands, so not much development is possible except for at Bathurst, Hilda, and Yonge. Stops at Bayview and Leslie are expected to be predominantly used to transfer to/from north-south lines.

East End
Don Mills Road
Woodbine Avenue (positioned to the east of the intersection, also serving Victoria Park Avenue)
Pharmacy Avenue/Esna Park Drive
Warden Avenue
Birchmount Road (positioned to the east of the intersection)
Milliken GO

This area is a mix of low density residential and slightly higher density industrial. Not much redevelopment potential here, but it does hit some trip generators on the Markham side.

I imagine there being bus-only centre lanes for as much of this route as possible. I don't believe one can expect this route to solve the majority of Steeles' transit woes. YRT (or VIVA Red) operation should have a branch (or diverge completely) north at Warden to terminate in the under-construction downtown of Markham, connecting the proposed York U campus there to the main campus at Keele. TTC service would most likely continue east after Milliken along the current Steeles East route, and west along the curbside on Steeles instead of turning north at Jane.
 

Rainforest

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Mar 23, 2008
Messages
3,872
Reaction score
1,186
Steeles BRT (aka Viva Red if we ever get some kind of fare integration between YRT and TTC)
One problem with Steeles BRT: Steeles has some tight sections, with only 4 lanes in total, and houses standing quite close to the traffic lanes.

One such section is between Bathurst and Hilda, another just east of Yonge, and if I remember correctly, there exists at least one 4-lane section further east.

Highrises on the north side of Steeles just east of Bathurst have been built fairly recently, and placed close to the road. No allowance to add the transit lanes. Maybe those transit lanes can still be squeezed in, but that' not obvious just looking at the street.
 

Leo_Chan

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Nov 13, 2016
Messages
3,091
Reaction score
1,833
Location
Richmond Hill
In the same vein as the Lawrence proposal, here's one that would be even more likely to be continuous:

Steeles BRT (aka Viva Red if we ever get some kind of fare integration between YRT and TTC)

West End
Highway 407 Terminal (connections with Line 1, YRT, GO)
Pioneer Village (connections with Line 1, YRT)
Keele Street
Alness Street/Viceroy Road
Dufferin Street
New Westminster Drive
Bathurst Street

This area is mostly low-density commercial and industrial properties. Between Alness/Viceroy and Dufferin, especially, is a medium stretch of strip malls and industrial buildings. Perhaps a few of the buildings next to Steeles Avenue could be redeveloped into mid-rises with commercial frontage, to provide a smoother transition into the apartment buildings next to the Don River West.

Thornhill
Bathurst Street
Cactus Avenue/Palm Gate Boulevard
Hilda Avenue
Yonge Street (connection with Line 1)
Henderson Avenue/Maxome Avenue (positioned to the west of the intersection)
Bayview Avenue (existing bus loop preserved for Bayview service)
Laureleaf Road
Leslie Street
Don Mills Road

This area has a large amount of established neighbourhoods and parklands, so not much development is possible except for at Bathurst, Hilda, and Yonge. Stops at Bayview and Leslie are expected to be predominantly used to transfer to/from north-south lines.

East End
Don Mills Road
Woodbine Avenue (positioned to the east of the intersection, also serving Victoria Park Avenue)
Pharmacy Avenue/Esna Park Drive
Warden Avenue
Birchmount Road (positioned to the east of the intersection)
Milliken GO

This area is a mix of low density residential and slightly higher density industrial. Not much redevelopment potential here, but it does hit some trip generators on the Markham side.

I imagine there being bus-only centre lanes for as much of this route as possible. I don't believe one can expect this route to solve the majority of Steeles' transit woes. YRT (or VIVA Red) operation should have a branch (or diverge completely) north at Warden to terminate in the under-construction downtown of Markham, connecting the proposed York U campus there to the main campus at Keele. TTC service would most likely continue east after Milliken along the current Steeles East route, and west along the curbside on Steeles instead of turning north at Jane.
Seems like a lack of GO connections:
177446

Also, this should be discussed in the Steeles RT thread.
 
Last edited:

Alexut

New Member
Member Bio
Joined
Feb 16, 2016
Messages
16
Reaction score
15
One problem with Steeles BRT: Steeles has some tight sections, with only 4 lanes in total, and houses standing quite close to the traffic lanes.

One such section is between Bathurst and Hilda, another just east of Yonge, and if I remember correctly, there exists at least one 4-lane section further east.

Highrises on the north side of Steeles just east of Bathurst have been built fairly recently, and placed close to the road. No allowance to add the transit lanes. Maybe those transit lanes can still be squeezed in, but that' not obvious just looking at the street.
Bathurst to Hilda has a wide section of grass separating the sidewalk and the road on either side, with around 3m on the south side and 11m on the north, which I believe was left for specifically this purpose.

Yonge to Bayview is a different story. There's something like 2km of suburban single-family homes with driveways going directly onto Steeles and those would probably have to be expropriated for a project like this.
 

Leo_Chan

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Nov 13, 2016
Messages
3,091
Reaction score
1,833
Location
Richmond Hill
Bathurst to Hilda has a wide section of grass separating the sidewalk and the road on either side, with around 3m on the south side and 11m on the north, which I believe was left for specifically this purpose.

Yonge to Bayview is a different story. There's something like 2km of suburban single-family homes with driveways going directly onto Steeles and those would probably have to be expropriated for a project like this.
Or just run in mixed traffic.
 

north-of-anything

New Member
Member Bio
Joined
Dec 21, 2018
Messages
99
Reaction score
88
Location
Bradford
Seems like a lack of GO connections:
View attachment 177148
A connection to the Barrie Line would be nice, but it's right in the middle of a current GO station (York University) and a better location for a new station at Highway 7. The Richmond Hill Line at Steeles is flanked on both sides by single family home backyards, and also backs onto a golf course in the northeast. There wasn't much that could be done on the GO front besides the connections I already put down.

With regards to the section between Yonge and Bayview, I tried to load it in Google Street View to get a better look but it somehow crashed my computer so badly it logged me out. From what I did see, even if land could be expropriated from driveways and front lawns, it wouldn't be enough for bus lanes. That area would probably be one where mixed traffic is the only option. (Though the one house just east of Yonge that's currently home to a psychic can probably be bulldozed, but not for any bus lane-related reason.)
 

M II A II R II K

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 24, 2007
Messages
3,476
Reaction score
414
Could there be a feasibility of having platforms on the Union Station roof for to accommodate more services there, like in the old sketches of GO ALRT elevated above the building.
 

micheal_can

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Dec 24, 2016
Messages
1,373
Reaction score
677
Could there be a feasibility of having platforms on the Union Station roof for to accommodate more services there, like in the old sketches of GO ALRT elevated above the building.
It is a heritage building. I doubt anyone would agree to that. However, going over the railway shed might be possible.
 

north-of-anything

New Member
Member Bio
Joined
Dec 21, 2018
Messages
99
Reaction score
88
Location
Bradford
I think there are cheaper ways for Union to accommodate more services, or at least ways that don't involve trains climbing up steep slopes to reach the top of the station.
 

BurlOak

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Dec 7, 2011
Messages
5,642
Reaction score
1,407
I think there are cheaper ways for Union to accommodate more services, or at least ways that don't involve trains climbing up steep slopes to reach the top of the station.
Technically, an elevated station allows for deceleration while climbing into the station, and acceleration while leaving it. That's a good thing.
 

micheal_can

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Dec 24, 2016
Messages
1,373
Reaction score
677
Technically, an elevated station allows for deceleration while climbing into the station, and acceleration while leaving it. That's a good thing.
Depends on the route. It may already be high enough that it might be at the height, or even higher than the station platform.
 
Top