DSC
Superstar
Member Bio
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2008
- Messages
- 19,643
- Reaction score
- 28,149
- Location
- St Lawrence Market Area
The problem with this whole development (discussed months ago) is that the site had very 'extensive' development 'allowances' due to an OMB decision from the 1990s and if the developer had built what he had 'of right' it would probably be an even worse mess than it is. It is still beyond me how what may have been acceptable 30 years ago could ever be the base line of what is acceptable now but we also live in a world where a building permit, once issued, never seems to expire.It is baffling to me that this development ever got approved in the first place. It is a total pig from an urban design perspective, does not have significant public/community benefits associated with it (only $2.5M Section 37), and from what I can tell from looking at the public record, the City never supported it and yet did not show up to oppose it at the LPAT hearing (in fact they settled with the developer on mysterious terms).
Very suss.