Toronto The Well | 174.03m | 46s | RioCan | Hariri Pontarini

karledice · Jan 8, 2020

got it right said:
First thing I noticed on the renderings was mature 40 year old trees where a train track exists.....go from there.

hahahaha very good point
It's not even final that we get a park there...lol...

TossYourJacket · Jan 8, 2020

got it right said:
First thing I noticed on the renderings was mature 40 year old trees where a train track exists.....go from there.

Yeah, the glass colour might be the least of the inaccuracies there ?

Rascacielo · Jan 8, 2020

Question about the thread title (174m, 46 storeys). While I know that for multi-tower projects UT always gives the height of the tallest building, does it also use the maximum number of stories in the project in the title, even if the building with the maximum number of stories is not the tallest building in the development? Looking at the title, most people will assume that the 174 m tower has 46 floors, while it actually only has 36. It's the shorter residential tower that has 46 floors.

Red Mars · Jan 9, 2020

Jan 8, 2020

Red Mars · Jan 10, 2020

Jan 10, 2020

Jan 9, 2020

interchange42 · Jan 10, 2020

Rascacielo said:
Question about the thread title (174m, 46 storeys). While I know that for multi-tower projects UT always gives the height of the tallest building, does it also use the maximum number of stories in the project in the title, even if the building with the maximum number of stories is not the tallest building in the development? Looking at the title, most people will assume that the 174 m tower has 46 floors, while it actually only has 36. It's the shorter residential tower that has 46 floors.

It seems that's a bug in the auto-threadnaming code: the order of buildings in the database file has the 36-storey office tower corresponding with the correct height, but the code has grabbed the highest number of floors and largest number in the height column independently. I'm sure Ed will have the IT guy fix that.

42

Johnny Au · Jan 10, 2020

interchange42 said:
It seems that's a bug in the auto-threadnaming code: the order of buildings in the database file has the 36-storey office tower corresponding with the correct height, but the code has grabbed the highest number of floors and largest number in the height column independently. I'm sure Ed will have the IT guy fix that.

42

It would be great if it could be manually overwritten.

CanadianDriver · Jan 10, 2020

Hi folks, just out of curiosity, why did they leave a gap there?

ChesterCopperpot · Jan 11, 2020

Construction hoist I'm guessing

ptbotrmpfn · Jan 11, 2020

Loading platform?

Downtown Toronto · Jan 12, 2020

January 10th 2020

AHK · Jan 14, 2020

CanadianDriver said:
Hi folks, just out of curiosity, why did they leave a gap there?

View attachment 224969

That is a platform extending from the edge of the floor, for the tower crane to be able to drop construction materials for a floor which already has other floors formed above it.

Here is a view of the Spadina side, with three other platforms protruding from the edge of the building