News   Jul 26, 2024
 753     0 
News   Jul 26, 2024
 1.9K     2 
News   Jul 26, 2024
 1.6K     2 

Toronto St. Clair West Transit Improvements | ?m | ?s | TTC

From the Post:

St. Clair: Our new midtown highway

Howard Levine, National Post
Published: Friday, December 01, 2006

When the Streetcars for Toronto Committee convinced our civic leaders to retain the city's streetcar system in November, 1972, we who formed that group were filled with pride and optimism. It was a citizen-inspired vote in favour of modern, clean and neighbourhood-friendly transit.

Today, sadly, I must say that I'm ashamed by what is happening to our streetcar system, especially on St. Clair Avenue West.

The dedicated streetcar right-of-way project is a mess that will satisfy no one and falls far short of its potential. The concept is valid and even overdue, but the design now under construction between Yonge Street and Vaughan Road -- to be extended west to Keele Street -- is symptomatic of myopia, Toronto-centrism and a refusal to learn from experience in other cities.

Such an important project should have been submitted to an international proposal call.

The urban design consultants hired for St. Clair publicly acknowledged their firm had no experience with a similar project. Nonetheless, they concluded the existing streetlighting levels along St. Clair were below standard, although the retired Toronto Hydro chief engineer who designed the system in 1992 strongly disagreed. This arbitrary choice for new streetlights on fewer and higher masts and with higher intensity leads directly to the necessity for a new system of centre poles for the TTC overhead. Centre poles result in a significantly wider transit median because of the clearance required for emergency vehicles. Bad choice.

Raising the St. Clair streetcar right-of-way 18 centimetres above the road surface means the tracks dip down wherever cross-streets intersect them. The track will undulate along the entire route, resulting in increased track and wheel wear.

There are no plans to update or even improve the archaic traffic control system; the existing traffic controls are supposedly timed to reflect conditions manually observed once or twice a year.

State-of-the-art traffic controls have been perfected and successfully installed throughout the world. These react to constantly changing traffic patterns and flows, vastly improving traffic movement. But not on St. Clair. Just as on Spadina and Queens Quay, streetcars will not be given any priority at intersections.

Our quaint pay-as-you-enter fare collection system will continue - just as it was when the TTC was established in 1921. Infinitely faster and more efficient automated fare systems will not be used on St. Clair or anywhere else on the TTC, despite the operational and cost advantages proved on every other major transit system in the world.

Perhaps worst of all, accessible, low-floor and air-conditioned light rail vehicles will not be used. Our 27-year-old streetcar fleet is past its useful life and needs to be replaced citywide with the type of modern equipment that has transformed streetcar systems worldwide into the accessible, comfortable and high-capacity transit services they can and must be.

And then there's this: The new traffic lane widths on St. Clair are equivalent to the standard required by the U.S. Interstate Highway System for 110 km/h.

A slight case of overkill?

Although the TTC initiated the project ostensibly to improve the reliability of the St. Clair streetcar, the City's Transportation Department quickly hijacked the scheme to divert criticism and detailed analysis of its real goal, namely to severely rebuild the street into a city highway slashing through the very heart of midtown.

One only has to examine the construction now under way west from Yonge -- right-of-way expansion to eight lanes at major intersections, wider turning curves at cross streets, two through lanes of consistent width in each direction, and narrowed sidewalks in many spots made even more dangerous where they are sloped into the curves.

Most of the project's cost is really for the road, the streetcar having being used as a guise to impose upon St. Clair Avenue the Transportation Department's template for suburban roads, a template frozen in the 1960s and oblivious to decades of innovation and rethinking about cities.

A situation as disheartening as this one was never imagined by the members of the Streetcars for Toronto Committee when we fought to keep the system. How ironic that Toronto made such a bold decision 34 years ago, but totally screwed up on St. Clair.

Howard Levine is a former Toronto city councillor and a transportation and urban planner.

© National Post 2006

AoD
 
That's really interesting about the high-intensity lighting and the need for the centre poles. With slightly narrower lanes and a narrower ROW, we could have either wider sidewalks or bike lanes, or even maybe both.

And the traffic light situation is inexcusable, on Spadina, here, anywhere.

Now both issues are not the TTC's fault. They are the fault of the Transportation and Works, which demand wide streets and over-engineered highway design, and refuse to turn on the streetcar priority system.
 
Like I said before, you can't have the best of both worlds. A transit right of way, left turn lanes, curb parking, wide sidewalks, bike lanes, and at least two through lanes of traffic can't happen south of Lawrence.
 
Now both issues are not the TTC's fault. They are the fault of the Transportation and Works, which demand wide streets and over-engineered highway design, and refuse to turn on the streetcar priority system.

The separate streetcar pole in the middle of the ROW has the benefit of making elimination of a whole lot of overhead wires possible. The width of the sidewalks being so thin is a result of the community complaints which wouldn't stand reduction of on-street parking, turn lanes, or traffic lanes. The St.Clair ROW can't be all things to all people and no solution would be accepted as perfect by all people. I completely agree with the streetcar priority. It drives me nuts that the streetcar on Queens Quay needs to stop at a red while cars going in the same direction as the streetcar have a green.
 
^ that'll change once the south lane (Eastbound) on Queen Quay is closed according to the West8 project. Few red lights will be encountered along the route of the Central waterfront once the west8 proposal is implemented.
 
the sidewalks are the least important part of the street anyways. Compared to cars and streetcars, they carry minimal amount of traffic on St. Clair. More than 6 feet would be excessive.
 
Yingyang,

Yeah, you're right, all that sidewalks are good for is pedestrians and businesses. Not important at all.

(sarcasm)
 
"the sidewalks are the least important part of the street anyways."

The sidewalks are very important for the dozens of businesses and tens of thousands of residents that live in that corridor. As a local resident- one would rarely drive to get to the Yonge/ St. Clair shops. The construction is a pain for a few years- but the new ROW is a huge step forward. Cars are not the future, it's the ped walkways and streetcars- that's what is important.
 
i meant on that specific stretch of st. clair they are building right now, it's pretty quiet pedestrian-wise no businesses at all only sleepy low-density residential with a few stubby offices
 
Accessible to who? The streetcars themselves wont be accessible until the TTC orders new streetcars. The platforms have accessible ramps at the intersections. I dont think the ROW itself will have enough barrier to block drivers that want to break the law and turn across them... the Queens Quay ROW doesn't have enough height to prevent it and I don't think the St.Clair ROW was going to be built like Spadina.
 
wheelchairs. so when they get new streetcars, disabled people will be able to use the st. clair ROW? even the other streetcars?
 
St. Clair seems to have a slightly higher trackbed than Queen's Quay, but not much. I guess emergency vehicles might have to be able to cross the roadway.
 
Yes, by law all new transit vehicles must be accessible so all ROW routes will certainly be accessible. Non-ROW routes will be a little more difficult because the streetcars don't run next to a curb... but likely there would be a fold out ramp. The routes where the current old streetcars run will not be accessible and there is no way to make those vehicles accessible.
 

Back
Top