SunriseChampion
Senior Member
2231$? So I'm getting a good deal? Great.
This is also a good example about how not all landlords are evil.So, I recently became privy to all sorts of rental information in regards to my neighbours. So, the neighbour next door to me, with a slightly better view is paying 935$/mth for a 1 bedroom that is 9m2+ bigger than mine whilst I'm paying 1700$/mth for my smaller 1 bedroom, because it's partially renovated. I'm not jealous or anything...I mean, the lady's a pensioner....but it makes me laugh inside (laugh because crying is defeatist). A bit of new tile, new kitchen cupboards and bottom-end stove and fridge and double the price! Welcome to Toronto.
It is almost universal that newer tenants pay more rent than those who are long-term residents. Partly it is that they objected to increases in the past (or the landlord did not impose one) and also that the current market price for rentals is high!This is also a good example about how not all landlords are evil.
If not for the discretion of individual landlords, that pensioner you describe may be forced to pay rent comparable to yourself. Regulation to ensure conformity across the market can end up hurting many people.
What happens when the workers who make a city function can no longer afford to live there?
In Toronto, some paramedics are commuting from as far away as St. Catharines and Campbellford. Social workers are competing with their clients for housing. And cooks, who are turning out tasty fare in the city’s signature restaurants, are often priced out of the neighbourhoods they serve.
There are a lot of people in their 30s working in Toronto kitchens who are still living at home with their parents, says chef and caterer Ang McCluskey, who has spent decades cooking and mentoring young kitchen workers.
A Toronto couple with a rental property in Oshawa, Ont., says the last seven months have been a nightmare.
Myron Madey and Kevin Seguin say the process of evicting a tenant who stopped paying rent took longer than it should have because of delays at the Landlord and Tenant Board.
But Madey and Seguin, who say they are out close to $30,000 between the rent they are owed, legal fees and cleaning the home, say that's not enough.
"It took too long," Madey said, adding that during the lengthy process, the tenant fled.
"It's been horrible ... just a nightmare for us," he added.
It's an issue affecting many landlords in the GTA, Madey's and Seguin's lawyer says — tenants skipping out on rent and getting away with it, partly because the Landlord and Tenant Board can't deal with the cases fast enough.
Jordan Donich, a lawyer who represented the couple says by the time the couple came to him, the situation was already bad. But his concerns span beyond this case.
"Why would you take a chance of supplying the market with affordable housing, or any type of housing if it means you have to wait half a year to get rid of a tenant, and you never recover your money?" Donich said.
The lawyer says in Madey's and Seguin's case, he was surprised that it took three months for them to get a hearing date, and even though they have an order, they haven't really won.
"What's a win is getting your money back," he said.
Donich says tenants like theirs often know how to play the system. And if they don't care about having bad credit, it can be challenging to recover the money they're owed without pursing further legal action.
"This is a systemic problem and probably only experienced landlords or corporations know this."
If it's like other Tribunals, it's because this government has chosen not to reappoint adjudicators when their term ended, without replacement. That's what happened at the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (a.k.a OMB) - numbers of adjudicators down nearly 50%.
More than one third of Toronto’s condo market is owned by people who do not live in the units, but prefer to rent them out, use them as secondary residences, or leave them empty instead.
The situation is not as drastic as Vancouver’s condo market, where about half of all units in the city are investor-owned, but it’s still a significant share of the condo market.
Markham has the highest rate of not-owner occupied condos at 38.7 per cent, followed by Toronto city at 37.9 per cent, Mississauga at 35.6 per cent, Richmond Hill at 31.6 per cent, Brampton at 29.9 per cent and Vaughan at 29.7 per cent. The average for the Toronto area is 36.6 per cent of condos that are not owner-occupied.
The analysis fits with the findings of John Pasalis, president of Toronto’s Realosophy Realty Brokerage and analyst of the Greater Toronto Area. Mr. Pasalis believes most Toronto condo investors buy pre-construction and hang onto them for rental income or flip them after completion. The other major investor type are those who move into bigger places but hang on to their condos for rental income because of strong demand. Mr. Pasalis has found that Toronto condo prices rose significantly since the federal government introduced new mortgage “stress test” rules in 2016. Because first-time buyers were shut out of the detached house market, they turned increasingly to the condo market, driving prices up.
As for the revelation that Toronto and Vancouver markets have a hefty share of investor-owned condos, Mr. Pasalis and others agree that it’s not an ideal situation if purpose built rentals aren’t coming online at the same time. Investor-owned condos often sit empty, or underused, and are easily utilized for short-term rental, all of which takes away from local housing. And even when rented out to locals, investor owned condos aren’t secure rental housing.
Purpose-built rental buildings offer far greater security because they aren’t at the whims of market forces. Investor-owned market condos are susceptible to shifting markets and their use as rental stock can ebb and flow, Mr. Pasalis says.
“I definitely see it as problematic that virtually all of the rental stock built in the GTA over the past 15 years has come from condominiums versus purpose built rentals.
“It’s problematic for a number of reasons. Firstly, those tens of thousands of units are not permanent – many of the condos that are currently used as rentals now are being sold to end users, which shrinks the pool of rental units.
“Finally, if condo prices take a bit of a hit in the near future, we could very well see a decent number of mom and pop investors rush to dump their units, which could make what would have been a modest cool down into a more severe decline.
“End users don’t rush for the exit when prices dip a bit, but investors are less tied to their units so are more likely to take their cash and run if they see a decline in the near future.”
It's the right decision, IMO. And these idiot AirBnB owners blew a good thing through their greed and now the whole thing has collapsed.Article in the Guardian highlighting the Toronto AirBnB clampdown:
Airbnb faces backlash in Toronto and Paris
Rental company hit by clampdown in Canada and unrest in Francewww.theguardian.com
So a landlord can't use Airbnb to rent out a bedroom to a university student, since that would be more than 28 days?Under the new rules, short-term rentals will only be allowed in landlords' principal residences for up to 180 nights a year for an entire house or apartment. Homeowners could also rent up to three bedrooms year-round on a short-term — defined as less than 28 days — basis.
So a landlord can't use Airbnb to rent out a bedroom to a university student, since that would be more than 28 days?
I wonder if this impact home swapping services, where no money changes hands. https://www.lovehomeswap.com/how-it-works
Tell them they are (or were) leaches upon the city and its residents. What did they think was going to happen when the city is seeing a massive housing shortage, record numbers of condo units being built but no increase in vacancy rates?At my work (I work in a condo) we have multiple people that own multiple units for the sole purpose of renting them out as STRs.
These people were expecting the appeal to go in their favor and never believed the city would win. I've never seen such a grim look on people's faces. They are now running for the exits before they lose their shirts.