Santiago Calatrava’s abomination does not respect the heritage of this parking lot. It is visible and has massing which means it might be seen by people and will cast shadows somewhere. The form is too rotund and its corners do not intersect at 90 degrees. Glass not green enough.View attachment 318948I I wonder what the DRP would think of something like this.View attachment 318949View attachment 318950
If it looks like an object that's landed, then I might argue that it succeeds in its objective of resembling a venue that host e-sports events. See the Spodek Arena in Poland:So the DRP said this thing looks like "an object that's landed" - I'm not making any comparisons here but I'm wondering what they would have thought of the TD Centre...
It's so incredibly disappointing that the city doesnt seem to want to vault itself into the 21st century. This is postmodernism at its finest and would be a statement and a world class venue that would be immediately recognizable. Cities like toronto need iconic venues like this if they are to cement themselves as world class cities. I really hope something ambitious still gets built here.
The UT article says the DRP was shown something different and the final product wasn't what they had been shown.I can't say I'm a fan of this proposal, but where the hell was the Design Review Panel when they built Hotel X?
If that's the case, is there a penalty and/or stop work order for future bait & switch attempts like this? Mere tut-tutting after the thing is built will hardly be a deterrent.The UT article says the DRP was shown something different and the final product wasn't what they had been shown.
View attachment 318948I I wonder what the DRP would think of something like this.View attachment 318949View attachment 318950
If these aren't your images, you need to add sources.I'm sure they would hate this too.
Add sources or your post will be deleted!If it looks like an object that's landed, then I might argue that it succeeds in its objective of resembling a venue that host e-sports events. See the Spodek Arena in Poland:
View attachment 318957
View attachment 318960
View attachment 318958
View attachment 318959
Deleted!If these aren't your images, you need to add sources.
Add sources or your post will be deleted!
Deleted as well. People can check out the google image search I suppose.If these aren't your images, you need to add sources.
Add sources or your post will be deleted!
If that's the case, is there a penalty and/or stop work order for future bait & switch attempts like this? Mere tut-tutting after the thing is built will hardly be a deterrent.
Images of the original Hotel X plans can be found in that thread on page. They are completely different from what was eventually built.The UT article says the DRP was shown something different and the final product wasn't what they had been shown.