I think the reason I like it so much is because it reminds me of this.
That's a great building, though I find the comparison to 1970s buildings and Brutalism to be not just in the shape of the podium, but to its potential massiveness. It could be wonderfully detailed but overpoweringly big. That kind of architecture that makes people feel small without actually being monumental generally isn't well received by the public. In the 1960s-1970s, I suppose that the attached monorail (skywalks or underground walkways in other cases) meant that it didn't matter how it felt to be walking past such buildings on the ground, but we ultimately realized that people are still going to walk the streets and experience buildings at ground level primarily.
Anybody have any idea when they will begin digging?
Critique
I don't quite understand your comment. Is there metal above the roof? I don't think aluminum metal can be used as
a roofing material. But I am not an expert. I think Beyond the Sea has the same architects and builders as Eau du Soleil. If you look at Beyond the Sea, the building looks like it is built with quality. The Foyer looks impressive. I parked in the underground garage and it all looks well built and clean and brightly lit. The quality should be the same with this.
Critique
I don't quite understand your comment. Is there metal above the roof? I don't think aluminum metal can be used as
a roofing material. But I am not an expert. I think Beyond the Sea has the same architects and builders as Eau du Soleil. If you look at Beyond the Sea, the building looks like it is built with quality. The Foyer looks impressive. I parked in the underground garage and it all looks well built and clean and brightly lit. The quality should be the same with this.
I hope the architects have experience with this..