I'm curious how they're going to handle the streetcar overhead power wires. The old bridge kind of had them tacked on. Hopefully they've engineered that into the new design so it doesn't look out of place.
What was tacked onto it is basically a cover pate to keep the wire from touching the bridge when a streetcar goes under it. And also when a pole comes off too. If you look at all the other bridges and even the underground streetcar stations they all have similar pates over the wire too. The TTC will probably put a new one in place once they are able to put in the new wires on Queen street.I'm curious how they're going to handle the streetcar overhead power wires. The old bridge kind of had them tacked on. Hopefully they've engineered that into the new design so it doesn't look out of place.
If that's the case then it clearly shows that they din't consult with the TTC when the designed this thing taht or whoever designed it wasn't informed of it having to cross a street with streetcar wires under it. What's net we find out during a big snowstorm that that they didn't take into account the weight of snow and Ice on it or we have Ice falling off of it and the street has to be closed because of falling ice.I just asked one guy on site where the streetcar cables are going to connect. He said that the entire bottom would be glass and didn't think the power cables would connect anywhere. Not sure if he's wrong but I'm looking at the middle and I too don't see any connections for the cables. Maybe the glass will insulate the bridge and it won't require any protection from powered wires. Maybe the bridge will twist in a way that creates enough room to run the overhead wires under it without touching.
If that's the case then it clearly shows that they din't consult with the TTC when the designed this thing taht or whoever designed it wasn't informed of it having to cross a street with streetcar wires under it. What's net we find out during a big snowstorm that that they didn't take into account the weight of snow and Ice on it
I was merely joking as apparently when the crystal was first designed for the ROM they forgot to take into account the weight of snow on the roof. I may be mistaken on that but I believe I herd it somewhere. Plus the structure ended up looking very different then the original model showed.None of the above are true or even a remote possibility.
I was merely joking as apparently when the crystal was first designed for the room they fort to take into account the weight of snow on the roof.
yeah I meant the ROM. I just figured that was the reason why the design of it changed so much from the models to the end result. I thought originally it had more glass in it and less aluminum or rather none at all.Do you mean the ROM? Because that is also not true. I think you underestimate the number of checks and balances in the design process. Snow loads are a very basic part of a Canadian architect's understanding of structure.