sixrings
Senior Member
When do we hear anything about eglinton west?
This is a really good point. However, you're missing one crucial part of this "fastest" route, the fares.
I wouldn't say gravy just not a part of the initial building cost they are making allowances fro them to be put in later though. I would assume they would want to cost it out so they an spread it out over a few years like they are with the elevators at the current sations.No money for platform screen doors, of course. Safety is "gravy".
I agree totally, LRT was always advertised in Toronto as basically a subway but above ground in the median of a street. This isn't really the case, LRT is more of an enhanced surface route rather than a rapid transit route. This isn't a bad thing at all though, LRT is still a major improvement over buses and it doesn't need to be as fast as a subway as long as it's reliable and stops where necessary. It's perfect for some corridors including Eglinton East and Finch West, just because it wont be as fast as the subway doesn't mean it will be slow, what's the point of having surface transit when the stops are so inaccessible (1 km away from each other)
I would want that 190 Rocket from Don Mills to Scarborough Centre to UTSC! That's actually a really valid proposal. (Of course I'm saying this because I would use it. Which is the same as what people say about the Sheppard Stubway).Fares should not be a problem in this case. TTC will continue to operate bus #38 along Ellesmere. A 38E express is likely to be added, or a branch of 190 Rocket can be extended to UTSC.
If bus-only lanes are added on Ellesmere as part of Durham Pulse BRT, surely the TTC buses will be able to use them within the Toronto borders.
And transit geeks will show up for that and cheer as the TBMs are being risen.
If they see their shadow that means there is 6 more years of construction....right?Yeap, TBM extraction starts on Monday night:
http://www.thecrosstown.ca/news-med...movals-eglinton-avenue-closure-yonge-st-to-du
I thought they were pretty much scrap now that the company that built them, has exited the TBM business. I'd think there's be parts issues and rehab issues. Wasn't this their last contract?I notice the TBM's will be removed to a storage site. Does this mean they can be reused for other projects? If so, would that make a continuous transit build marginally cheaper than the stop-start approach we follow?