ehlow
Senior Member
Yonge and Eglinton is increasingly becoming more and more urban with every construction project. I don't understand why people are arguing against separated cycle tracks because of their anecdotal "evidence" that they see 2 bikers on Yonge and Queen during rush hour, or that they think families can and should only live a car oriented lifestyle because they think that's the only way people can live their lives.
The point here is that there is a real potential for biking in this city and especially around this massive node. The whole notion of "if you build it they will come" cannot be more true. I really believe that adding visible, attractive, separated, safe bike lanes can really convince a lot of people to go bike for everyday errands like groceries, etc. I know this because it worked in many, many other cities, in the US, Canada, and around the world. After all, it's good for your wallet to bike, it's good for the environment, it's good for your health, and it's faster than walking, so why is biking even considered bad?
If you don't share my opinion, then keep in mind we can all yell about the potential of more bikers after taking a look at the effects of the pilot cycle tracks being added to Richmond, Adelaide, and Simcoe right now as we speak. Then we will really know if separated bike lanes really do have potential.
Great points.
Ugh... How long do we to deal with this whining from suburbanites who live nowhere near the affected neighborhoods.
The city is getting more urban and less car centric. The era of the cars ruling out city is coming to an end. Get over it. Gosh.
It reminds me of when Doug Ford couldn't believe that there are more pedestrians than cars at Yonge & Eg. This is Yonge & Eg, an increasingly urban node filled with pedestrians all day, not Scarborough or Etobicoke here.