Malthus
New Member
I'm really not understanding the reaction.
The TDSB already operates First Nation-focused schools. And this hasn't created any reaction I've ever seen. But when Black-focused schools are mentioned, everyone freaks out.
What's the difference?
There is indeed a first-nations focused school; and it is a horrible failure.
http://media.knet.ca/node/3313
The First Nations School of Toronto was started in 1977 as an "alternative school" within the public board as an effort to close the "achievement gap" between the academic performance of aboriginal students and non-native students. The report noted that "the achievement gap for aboriginal students has increased, rather than decreased, over the past five years."
The argument as to why it is a failure is that the province, in spite of its promises, failed to provide sufficient resources. Thing is, I am not convinced that resources alone is a good excuse for total failure - I went to a Toronto alternative school with few resources myself, and it wasn't such a horrible failure.
Sadly I predict that something very similar will happen to an Afrocentric school. It will be launched amidst fanfare and controversy, the province will make promises not kept, it will be a failure, and the province will be duly blamed for not providing sufficient materials and councellors or whatever.
I sincerely hope that this will not be the case, and I'm very willing to be proven wrong. I admit that I think the whole thing is wrong and backwards from an ideological point of view - I do not believe seperation is the way forwards. However, I'd be quite willing to bend those principles if I thought that it was really a good thing from the children's point of view - that having an Afrocentric schooling would be better for them, leading to less drop-outs and better life success. but nothing I have seen so far indicates that this would in fact be the case. Far from it.