EnviroTO
Senior Member
Nothing is happening now because it was cancelled. Duh.
When was it cancelled? Where is the press release. Where is the action passed in council cancelling the subway?
Nothing is happening now because it was cancelled. Duh.
When was it cancelled? Where is the press release. Where is the action passed in council cancelling the subway?
To cancel you need to take a process that exists and then make it not exist. Since absolutely nothing has changed with respect to the Sheppard subway extension it hasn't been cancelled. The next mayor could build a subway under the LRT line unless of course you consider the LRT to be performing the same function as the subway and thus annulling or invalidating the subway. If it performs the same function then perhaps we don't need a subway.
I can't say that I've ever met ANYONE outside of this forum who has called it the "stubway". I don't think normal people do that; and as such most people don't do that.Everyone calls it the "stubway"
Everyone knows that Sheppard is a stub of what it was supposed to be. Everyone calls it the "stubway". Why is it called that?
I can't say that I've ever met ANYONE outside of this forum who has called it the "stubway". I don't think normal people do that; and as such most people don't do that.
Looking in Google's news archive. No references to this in 2009. One in 2008 ... by Ed Drass ... I'm not sure Ed Drass counts as normal, in the sense I've used above. None in 2007. And one in 2006 in a CBC article referencing the "Civil Construction Alliance of Ontario". And then 6 uses of it by the Toronto Star from 2002 to 2005.Actually I think I first heard "stubway" in the media, not on here.
Looking in Google's news archive. No references to this in 2009. One in 2008 ... by Ed Drass ... I'm not sure Ed Drass counts as normal, in the sense I've used above. None in 2007. And one in 2006 in a CBC article referencing the "Civil Construction Alliance of Ontario". And then 6 uses of it by the Toronto Star from 2002 to 2005.
The Star seems to have given up on using the term ... so really it's just Ed Drass. My office is near the Sheppard line; not once have I ever heard anyone say "I took the stubway".
I didn't think it was invented here ... I just don't think it's in common usage, let alone to the point "Everyone calls it the "stubway" " - clearly that statement is 100% wrong.But thanks for proving my point that the term wasn't invented on UT.
So Miller is willing to expend political capital on downtown subway project (which is right and he should) but not willing to do it for Scarborough? Using the logic deployed on the Sheppard corridor, we should just settle for the half billion dollar rebuild (cheapest solution) of Yonge-Bloor which achieves the goal of relieving Yonge-Bloor instead of pressing for a 2 billion dollar subway line. Why wasn't Miller willing to go to bat for Scarborough and say that a subway is needed there so that STC can be connected to NYCC?
I think they only care that STC is a "node", and everyone should be forced to transfer to other services there.
Pretty silly to me.
I could be wrong, but that is what I am getting from all this.